I just had a debate with a Pats fan who was crapping on Lee Evans. The numbers last year show that Evans was better than any reciever in New England. My point was that Evans was a rookie and as good as his numbers were last year he is still only a rookie. At the same point his numbers may take a bit of a hit this year as I imagine we will pass a bit less and spread the ball out a bit more with Parrish in the picture.
One thing I couldn't overlook however was Givens value. He was drafted 42nd pick in the 7th round. Thats pretty impressive.
David Givens vs Lee Evans
If you had to build a team which reciever would you rather build your offense around? Try not to be a homer.
I would take Evans for a few reasons. He is small, but his quickness really allows him to beat tight coverage at the last second. He has great awareness on the field and he gives the offense the opportunity to stretch the field.
Evans can also be effective inbetween the hash marks too. I would give Givens the edge in the hash but Givens does not have the downfield strengths. Both players leave there ego's at home but I really feel Evans gives an offense more dimension.
One thing I couldn't overlook however was Givens value. He was drafted 42nd pick in the 7th round. Thats pretty impressive.
David Givens vs Lee Evans
If you had to build a team which reciever would you rather build your offense around? Try not to be a homer.
I would take Evans for a few reasons. He is small, but his quickness really allows him to beat tight coverage at the last second. He has great awareness on the field and he gives the offense the opportunity to stretch the field.
Evans can also be effective inbetween the hash marks too. I would give Givens the edge in the hash but Givens does not have the downfield strengths. Both players leave there ego's at home but I really feel Evans gives an offense more dimension.
Comment