Bills Analysis

[HHURRICANE]

After watching the Packers/Bills game I have come up with the following:

1) LT situation is fine, Gandy and Peters both looked solid.

2) Like it or not Reed (Ronnie Harmon) is going to stay at #3, he played well enough to stay.

3) Losman is the real deal. He does some rookie things but he is special.

4) RB is still a big question mark. The Bills need to start Gates earlier. I thought Reshard Lee played better than his numbers showed.

5) Cut the following players: Aiken, Brown, Burns, Goldsberry, Peoples, and Shauld Williams.

[HHURRICANE]

Re: Bills Analysis

And Coy Wire!!!

[casdhf]

Re: Bills Analysis

At least 5 of your 7 cuts will make it to the final cutdown.

[Bulldog]

Re: Bills Analysis

5) Cut the following players: Aiken, Brown, Burns, Goldsberry, Peoples, and Shauld Williams.

Why should Shaud Williams be cut? He really didn't even play on Sat. except on special teams. I thought he looked good in the Indy game.

[casdhf]

Re: Bills Analysis

He really didn't even play on Sat.

IMO, they're taking a look at Lee, Burns and Gates, since Willis and Shaud are locks.

[Bulldog]

Re: Bills Analysis

IMO, they're taking a look at Lee, Burns and Gates, since Willis and Shaud are locks.

I agree. Thats why I was wondering why he thought Williams should be cut.

[Jan Reimers]

Re: Bills Analysis

5) Cut the following players: Aiken, Brown, Burns, Goldsberry, Peoples, and Shauld Williams.

I basically agree with your first four points, but only Tony Brown and Peoples are likely to be cut on or before August 30. I think Shaud Williams makes it, along with Gates as McGahee's backups, and either Burns or Goldsberry sticks. Aiken also has a good chance to survive, because he is one of our few big, physical receivers.

[Sportsuser101]

Re: Bills Analysis

I think Burns stays. He is valuable on ST and is versatile as a running back and fullback.

[The_Philster]

Re: Bills Analysis

I'd say it's
McGahee, Williams, and Gates at RB...with Lee making a push to supplant Gates
Shelton and Burns at FB

[casdhf]

Re: Bills Analysis

I can also see us switching to a single back offense. McGahee doesn't need a FB to be sensational, I think we'll phase it out this season.

[dannyek71]

Re: Bills Analysis

I dont think aiken gets cut, shaud is def staying.

WR will be EM, LE, DH, SA, JR w/RP coming later in the year

[The_Philster]

Re: Bills Analysis

I can also see us switching to a single back offense. McGahee doesn't need a FB to be sensational, I think we'll phase it out this season.

Thurman didn't need one either but it was still good to have Carwell when it came time to grind it out

[casdhf]

Re: Bills Analysis

Thurman didn't need one either but it was still good to have Carwell when it came time to grind it out

McGahee is Carwell.

Gardner: 6'2'' - 235
McGahee: 6'0 - 228


Who needs a FB when our starting tailback is as big as one? Not worth keeping two on the roster, at least.

[DynaPaul]

Re: Bills Analysis

We should cut Drew Bledsoe. Oh wait... that already happened!