Carnell 128, McGahee 34

[Mr. Cynical]

So....since I didn't see the game I will ask the question....

Was it the typical crap play by our oline or bad play by our D that accounted for the difference?

My guess is that the D got tired from being on the field so long, therefore I would assume the oline is what it has been for years now....crap.

[Mr. Cynical]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

bump

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

It was Over thrown balls, balls thrown in the ground, balls thrown wide of its target. The Offense inability to make a 1st down.

I give Tampa credit they figured out the way to beat the Bills. Make Losman beat you.

[Novacane]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

I don't think you can say it was because they got tired because they were not stopping Williams right from the start.

On offense...................our line sucked. No holes

[Novacane]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

It was Over thrown balls, balls thrown in the ground, balls thrown wide of its target. The Offense inability to make a 1st down.

I give Tampa credit they figured out the way to beat the Bills. Make Losman beat you.

Dude..........that answer had nothing to do with the question asked. You're hatred and wanting to blame JP for everything is pathetic. He played like **** but he was far from alone.

[Luisito23]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

Dude..........that answer had nothing to do with the question asked. You're hatred and wanting to blame JP for everything is pathetic. He played like **** but he was far from alone.

And if he doesn't start next week I'm gonna be mad as F***.....




GO BILLS!!!!!!!!

[ZacGriffi~82]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

Well, we refused to run on first down. And when we did there was no blocking.

[Mr. Cynical]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

Well, we refused to run on first down. And when we did there was no blocking.

Sounds like the same ol' s**t we've been seing for years.

[ZacGriffi~82]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

Sounds like the same ol' s**t we've been seing for years.

That's what makes it hurt.

[Mr. Cynical]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

If we can't perform against Atlanta's D, it's going to be a long season AGAIN as well. Maybe someone will wake up on OBD and realize we haven't had an oline in over 5 years.

[colin]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

wills played poorly.

he danced too much against too fast of a team, he should of just slammed it up in there.

we ran draws that NEVER EVER WORK. we didn't run JP enough, he had lanes in the middle all day.

we got beat, our team is not ready for prime time yet, we need to get better on O and our run D isn't there.

[buffalofan19]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

So....since I didn't see the game I will ask the question....

Was it the typical crap play by our oline or bad play by our D that accounted for the difference?

My guess is that the D got tired from being on the field so long, therefore I would assume the oline is what it has been for years now....crap.

I don't think you can say it was because they got tired because they were not stopping Williams right from the start.

Cadillac Williams is a very good back. That's the reality. Early in the game, he was getting good runs, but the Bills held him in check for the most part. He wasn't killing the Bills early by any means. In the second half, the offense (mostly because of the o-line), could not do anything at all, an the defense wore down, and the floodgates opened. I think you can say it was because the defense got tired.

[Philagape]

Re: Carnell 128, McGahee 34

Obviously the Bucs won the trenches on both sides.

Willis was a disappointment. On some plays he danced, on others he seemed to give up. And the Bucs' defenders really played well, typified by Barber's stuff of Willis in the backfield. They sniffed him out perfectly.

As for Cadillac, wow the kid is good. He's got power, speed and moves. Our run defense was probably not up to par because Fletcher was out for significant periods, and there were frequent subs.