Pass Interference Needs to be Redefined

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Buffarama
    Football-Sport of the Gods
    • Jul 2002
    • 1231

    Pass Interference Needs to be Redefined

    PI calls are ruining the game. The penalty of spotting the ball doesn't need to be changed, but PI needs to be a blatant attempt to impose with the receiver.
    I can't stand this incidental contact 45 yard penalties given to teams throwing up jumpballs. That's just not football.
    If a guy knocks a receiver down, call it. If they bump shoulders running or going up for a ball, it should not be called. It needs to be a clear obvious attempt or severe contact.
  • Kelly The Dog
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 445

    #2
    I don't know why on earth they simply don't treat it like roughing or running into the kicker. If it's blatant and intentional, give them the ball at the spot of the foul. If it's incidental, give them a five yard penalty and replay the down, no automatic first.

    Comment

    • LtBillsFan66
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 35553

      #3
      You are right buffarama. What I want is for them to forgive PI when the pass is terribly underthrown and there is contact when the receiver tries to come back to the ball. There is usually contact when the coverage is tight - so you are rewarding the offense for a bad pass and penalizing the defense for excellent coverage.

      Comment

      • Earthquake Enyart
        Legendary Zoner
        • Jul 2002
        • 27521

        #4
        PI should be reviewable. No reason why it shouldn't be.

        Comment

        • Pride
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 10191

          #5
          Agree EE

          Comment

          • Captain gameboy
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 14287

            #6
            Originally posted by BillsFanOne
            What I want is for them to forgive PI when the pass is terribly underthrown and there is contact when the receiver tries to come back to the ball. There is usually contact when the coverage is tight - so you are rewarding the offense for a bad pass and penalizing the defense for excellent coverage.
            Fully agree. I've used these exact words months ago. It's gotten so bad that you can see teams use the underthrown ball as a intentional play. Get a one on one with a good "rebound type" receiver, get him alone with a DB and underthrow. He'll either catch it or get a call all the time. The NFL tightened up PI calls a few years ago to open up the game and for ratings reasons. It's gone too far. It's nearly impossible to be a DB now, and in my view, its hurting the game.

            Comment

            • Buffarama
              Football-Sport of the Gods
              • Jul 2002
              • 1231

              #7
              Mot agree it does hurt the game. It's the equivalent of passing out 3 penalty shots per team every hockey game.

              Comment

              Working...
              X