PDA

View Full Version : Winborn Traded to Jaguars...


FinNasty23
10-07-2005, 04:42 AM
Sorry guys... I know a good amount of people from this board really wanted him... I saw the article and thought I would post it for those who are interested...

ESPN Article about Trade... (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2183191) (<-- Link to the article)

Nasty
Sportsuser101
10-07-2005, 04:49 AM
He was traded from the 49ers to the Jaguars.
FinNasty23
10-07-2005, 04:52 AM
He was traded from the 49ers to the Jaguars. :hitself: my bad... typo, but give me a break... it is 5:45 in the morning...
Sportsuser101
10-07-2005, 04:55 AM
:lmao: my bad... typo, but give me a break... it is 5:45 in the morning...
Just making sure everyone knew what you were talking about.
FinNasty23
10-07-2005, 04:56 AM
Just making sure everyone knew what you were talking about.
Ya... just tierd. Were you one that wanted Winborn?
vicmantak
10-07-2005, 05:19 AM
This trade makes sense. Jaguars are struggling to stop the run but it will be interesting to see who will remain in the middle if Mike Peterson returns at 100% from his shoulder injury.
Forward_Lateral
10-07-2005, 06:49 AM
I'm glad. He's just another injury prone, undersized LB that has failed to live up to his "potential".
colin
10-07-2005, 07:18 AM
i'd say crowell is prolly a better player, i was impressed
madness
10-07-2005, 08:05 AM
I'm glad we have no depth at linebacker now too. Thanks for the bad news.
Sportsuser101
10-07-2005, 08:24 AM
Ya... just tierd. Were you one that wanted Winborn?
Nope.
Ebenezer
10-07-2005, 08:30 AM
I never saw this trade happening. TD has to prove that Crowell (his draftee) can cut it or not.
OpIv37
10-07-2005, 08:38 AM
I never saw this trade happening. TD has to prove that Crowell (his draftee) can cut it or not.

apparently that's more important than depth. If Fletcher goes down, our starting LB's would be Posey, Crowell and Stamer.
madness
10-07-2005, 08:57 AM
apparently that's more important than depth. If Fletcher goes down, our starting LB's would be Posey, Crowell and Stamer.
I'm seriously going to start negging you if you keep making sense like this. It's getting kind of old. :D
OpIv37
10-07-2005, 09:29 AM
I'm seriously going to start negging you if you keep making sense like this. It's getting kind of old. :D
lmao
Forward_Lateral
10-07-2005, 09:31 AM
apparently that's more important than depth. If Fletcher goes down, our starting LB's would be Posey, Crowell and Stamer.
Hagan would probably be the MLB and Crowell stay on the outside. I don't see Stamer starting unless Posey, Crowell and Fletcher all die.
madness
10-07-2005, 09:47 AM
Hagan would probably be the MLB and Crowell stay on the outside. I don't see Stamer starting unless Posey, Crowell and Fletcher all die.
:evil: Poor FBH.
OpIv37
10-07-2005, 09:48 AM
Hagan would probably be the MLB and Crowell stay on the outside. I don't see Stamer starting unless Posey, Crowell and Fletcher all die.

Still, Crowell and Hagan as starting LB's? Hell I bet half of Buffalo doesn't even know who those guys are.
Ebenezer
10-07-2005, 11:27 AM
Still, Crowell and Hagan as starting LB's? Hell I bet half of Buffalo doesn't even know who those guys are.
they're safe walking through the malls...
FinNasty23
10-08-2005, 03:07 AM
So were you guys really set on getting this guy? Were there any discussions between the bills and 49ers? Are you suprised that he went to the Jags?

Nasty