Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_Philster
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 52180

    Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

    Forked from: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

    Originally posted by YardRat
    A win over the Dolphins for starters.

    A chance at being 3-3 after 6 games.

    An offense that can put 20 points on the board.

    A QB that knows how to get the ball to the WR's.

    A QB that knows how to check out of a bad play and into a good one after seeing and understanding the defense in front of him.

    A QB that knows the value of sliding after gaining positive yardage.

    A QB leading the offense that the rest of the team has confidence in.

    An opportunity to possibly look forward to the play-offs instead of just tanking the season and, once again, pinning your hopes on 'next year'.

    Need I go on ???
    Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did? The play-calling was chamged quite a bit for Holcomb, IMO. If Clements weren't so in love with JP's physical skills, maybe he'd have cut down on the playbook for him and not put the game on his shoulders so much..as in..run the ball. They've made the excuse about getting away from the run against some of our earlier opponents that the run wasn't working...31 carries for 86 yards is less than 3 yards a pop...not what I consider a successful day running the ball but we stuck with it....double standards if you ask me
    The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!
  • Michael82
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 82330

    #2
    Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

    Originally posted by The_Philster
    Forked from: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

    Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did? The play-calling was chamged quite a bit for Holcomb, IMO. If Clements weren't so in love with JP's physical skills, maybe he'd have cut down on the playbook for him and not put the game on his shoulders so much..as in..run the ball. They've made the excuse about getting away from the run against some of our earlier opponents that the run wasn't working...31 carries for 86 yards is less than 3 yards a pop...not what I consider a successful day running the ball but we stuck with it....double standards if you ask me
    Great post, Phil! I totally agree with you.

    Comment

    • justasportsfan
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 71579

      #3
      Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

      Originally posted by The_Philster
      Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did? The play-calling was chamged quite a bit for Holcomb, IMO. If Clements weren't so in love with JP's physical skills, maybe he'd have cut down on the playbook for him and not put the game on his shoulders so much..as in..run the ball. They've made the excuse about getting away from the run against some of our earlier opponents that the run wasn't working...31 carries for 86 yards is less than 3 yards a pop...not what I consider a successful day running the ball but we stuck with it....double standards if you ask me
      Against the Falcons.

      CP/AT YDS TD INT
      J. Losman 10/23 75 0 1


      ATT YDS TD LG
      W. McGahee 27 140 1 21


      We lost. .

      The pass and running game are suppose to compliment each other. That's what happended last Sunday.



      we stuck w/ the run because we had a huge lead . A luxury we haven't had w/ Losman in there since the 2nd game.The fins have been stuffing teams for 2.8 yards a carry. We got that w/ a rookie and a player we got off the streets of miami on the right side . Not bad if you ask me.


      Why was Holcomb in there the first place? Because our QB was struggling. Call it a spark or whatever, we needed to fix what was broken. You don't have to be a genius to realize that.Did it work ? Here's proof . We won , Holcomb was efficient. Our wr's were catching balls and so were our TE's.


      Our D wasn't on the field for a long time that they had enough gas to make plays. The Brown fumble and the 2 sacks at the end of the game.
      Last edited by justasportsfan; 10-14-2005, 09:00 AM.
      sacrifice1
      https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

      Comment

      • YardRat
        Well, lookie here...
        • Dec 2004
        • 86154

        #4
        Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

        Originally posted by The_Philster
        Forked from: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

        Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did?
        I take it you didn't watch much of the second half of the Houston game, and missed the Atlanta, new Orleans, and Tampa games altogether.

        Blaming it on "play-calling" is BS...I certainly didn't see any drastic change in the types of plays the Bills ran, only in the execution. When you're able to complete a pass here and there, and put points on the board, it makes a huge difference in the amount of times you get to run the ball.

        Willis has been getting his hands on the ball, play-percentage wise, regardless of who the QB was. 16 plays were run in the second half of the Saints game up until desperation time with about 4-1/2 minutes left. 8 were pass attempts, 8 were Willis rushing attempts.

        Don't lay Losman's failure at someone else's feet, like Clements...place it on the shoulders they belong on.
        YardRat Wall of Fame
        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

        Comment

        • YardRat
          Well, lookie here...
          • Dec 2004
          • 86154

          #5
          Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

          Buffalo Bills at 07:57
          1-10-BUF23(7:57) W.McGahee left guard to BUF 37 for 14 yards (J.Bullocks). (Ball spot changes from last play due to change of possession.)
          1-10-BUF37(7:20) J.Losman sacked at BUF 28 for -9 yards (D.Howard). FUMBLES (D.Howard), and recovers at BUF 28. J.Losman to BUF 28 for no gain (W.Whitehead).
          2-19-BUF28(6:39) (Shotgun) J.Losman left guard to BUF 35 for 7 yards (F.Thomas).
          3-12-BUF35(5:53) (Shotgun) J.Losman sacked at BUF 24 for -11 yards (W.Smith).
          4-23-BUF24(5:29) B.Moorman punts 43 yards to NO 33, Center-M.Schneck. A.Hakim to NO 41 for 8 yards (G.Wilson).

          Buffalo Bills at 03:57
          1-10-BUF10(3:57) W.McGahee left guard to BUF 13 for 3 yards (C.Grant).
          2-7-BUF13(3:19) PENALTY on BUF-G.Jerman, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at BUF 13 - No Play.
          2-12-BUF8(3:08) W.McGahee right end to BUF 15 for 7 yards (D.Smith).
          3-5-BUF15(2:27) (Shotgun) J.Losman pass to J.Reed ran ob at BUF 29 for 14 yards (D.Smith). (No yards after catch.)
          1-10-BUF29(2:03) W.McGahee left tackle to BUF 34 for 5 yards (J.Craft, C.Watson). (BUF #71 Peters reported as an eligible receiver.)
          2-5-BUF34(1:23) W.McGahee right guard to BUF 34 for no gain (C.Grant).
          3-5-BUF34(:41) (Shotgun) J.Losman pass incomplete to E.Moulds.
          4-5-BUF34(:37) B.Moorman punts 58 yards to NO 8, Center-M.Schneck. A.Hakim to NO 13 for 5 yards (L.Ezekiel).

          1-10-BUF26(13:31) K.Holcomb pass incomplete to M.Campbell (D.Howard).
          2-10-BUF26(13:28) W.McGahee up the middle pushed ob at NO 34 for 40 yards (J.Bullocks).
          PENALTY on BUF-E.Moulds, Offensive Holding, 10 yards, enforced at NO 47.
          1-10-BUF41(13:02) K.Holcomb FUMBLES (Aborted) at BUF 43, and recovers at BUF 41. K.Holcomb to BUF 41 for no gain (C.Grant).
          2-12-BUF41(12:27) (Shotgun) K.Holcomb pass to J.Smith to NO 48 for 11 yards (J.Bullocks).
          3-1-NO48(11:45) W.McGahee up the middle to NO 48 for no gain (C.Grant).
          4-1-NO48(11:20) W.McGahee up the middle to 50 for -2 yards (D.Smith).
          YardRat Wall of Fame
          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

          Comment

          • Mudflap1
            Next Question!
            • Nov 2004
            • 3281

            #6
            Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

            The playcalling was not much different than when Losman was in the game. The only difference was that Holcomb was able to cycle through his options/progressions and Losman wasn't. We stuck to the run (for once) because it was the 2nd half and we were up by 17. Good! I'm glad they stuck to the run, but it became very predictable where and when we were going to run the ball. My complaint there is that the playcalling should have been mixed up a bit more. Play action pass on first, run on second (and hopefully) third. Stuff like that.Did anybody hear (maybe it was on the Sunday night telecast) Ben Roethlisberger talk about his first season? He said that he was thrown into the mix so quickly, that he only had time to memorize one receiver route per play, so what he would do is call the play, drop back to pass, purposely look off of a couple of other guys just to fool the defense, then throw it to the one guy that he knew would be there. He said now he knows most, if not all, the progressions.Losman needs time. Hopefully he'll get there. But don't pretend he would've had a 106 QB rating last week. That's double what his is for the season so far.Jon

            Comment

            • lordofgun
              in charge of you

              Administrator Emeritus
              • Jul 2002
              • 48416

              #7
              Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

              Originally posted by YardRat
              I take it you didn't watch much of the second half of the Houston game, and missed the Atlanta, new Orleans, and Tampa games altogether.

              Blaming it on "play-calling" is BS...I certainly didn't see any drastic change in the types of plays the Bills ran, only in the execution. When you're able to complete a pass here and there, and put points on the board, it makes a huge difference in the amount of times you get to run the ball.

              Willis has been getting his hands on the ball, play-percentage wise, regardless of who the QB was. 16 plays were run in the second half of the Saints game up until desperation time with about 4-1/2 minutes left. 8 were pass attempts, 8 were Willis rushing attempts.

              Don't lay Losman's failure at someone else's feet, like Clements...place it on the shoulders they belong on.
              Just like you forgot about the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters against the fish?

              We barely held on against a crappy fish team.






              <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>

              Comment

              • BillsFever21
                Registered User
                • Aug 2004
                • 9067

                #8
                Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                Originally posted by lordofgun
                Just like you forgot about the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters against the fish?

                We barely held on against a crappy fish team.


                Holcomb only had 60 yards passing after the first quarter when the Dolphins finally decided to show up for the game.

                Comment

                • justasportsfan
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 71579

                  #9
                  Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                  you guys are blaming Holcomb for the playcalling being conservative in the second half?
                  sacrifice1
                  https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                  Comment

                  • colin
                    Drew's my hero!
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 2491

                    #10
                    Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                    since we are asking what ifs:

                    what starting losman too soon is hurting him?

                    what if losman is a bust?

                    what if he can learn more now on the bench instead of regressing in the games?

                    what if losman is putting too much pressure on himself and will lose his own and the team's confidence by playing poorly?

                    saying that holcombe won't lead us to a super bowl so we need to start losman isn't right, it assumes way too many things.

                    Comment

                    • justasportsfan
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 71579

                      #11
                      Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                      Originally posted by colin
                      what if he can learn more now on the bench instead of regressing in the games?
                      .
                      who was he watching last year? He may learn more from Holcomb than Drew. Holding on to the ball and waiting for wrs to get open was a Drew trait that JP may have adopted.
                      sacrifice1
                      https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                      Comment

                      • YardRat
                        Well, lookie here...
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 86154

                        #12
                        Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                        Originally posted by lordofgun
                        Just like you forgot about the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters against the fish?

                        We barely held on against a crappy fish team.
                        Holcomb's drives after the first quarter against the fish...

                        8 atts 7 comp 32 yds TD
                        2 atts 2 comp 11 yds
                        4 atts 2 comp 8 yds
                        4 atts 3 comp 22 yds
                        1 att 1 comp 8 yds
                        1 att 1 comp 5 yds
                        1 att 1 comp 17 yds FG

                        21 atts, 17 comp, 103 yds, 10 pts...and most importantly, a WIN.

                        I'll take that...you wouldn't??
                        YardRat Wall of Fame
                        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                        Comment

                        • finsrclowns
                          Registered User
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 1408

                          #13
                          Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                          Originally posted by The_Philster
                          Forked from: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                          Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did?
                          How do you know smoking causes cancer?
                          finsrclowns

                          Comment

                          • gr8slayer
                            Registered User
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 20796

                            #14
                            Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                            Originally posted by The_Philster
                            Forked from: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                            Question I have is how do people know JP wouldn't have played just as well against the Fish as Holcomb did? The play-calling was chamged quite a bit for Holcomb, IMO. If Clements weren't so in love with JP's physical skills, maybe he'd have cut down on the playbook for him and not put the game on his shoulders so much..as in..run the ball. They've made the excuse about getting away from the run against some of our earlier opponents that the run wasn't working...31 carries for 86 yards is less than 3 yards a pop...not what I consider a successful day running the ball but we stuck with it....double standards if you ask me
                            Bravo

                            Comment

                            • The_Philster
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 52180

                              #15
                              Re: Forked Thread: OK, let's compare...for those afflicted with ADD...

                              Originally posted by justasportsfan
                              you guys are blaming Holcomb for the playcalling being conservative in the second half?
                              Not unless Holcomb were in charge of the playcalling in all 5 games
                              The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X