Tweet
Kelly Holcomb Cleveland stats
349/550, 63.5%, 3867 yds, 7.0 yds/att, 29 tds, 22 ints, 1.32 td/int, 19.0 att/td, 32 sck, 17.2 att/sck, 85.2 rtg.
Drew Bledsoe's Buffalo stats
905/1531, 59.1%, 10,151 yds, 6.6 yds/att, 55 tds, 43 int, 1.27 td/int, 27.8 att/td, 140 sck, 10.9 att/sck, 79.2 rtg.
So, in every significant category, Kelly Holcomb through his four years at Cleveland was a better qb than Drew Bledsoe in his three years here.
And he was playing through the turmoil of the Tim Couch situation and the ineptitude of Butch Davis.
Whereas for three years here, Drew was handed everything on a silver platter.
Holcomb was significantly more accurate, more productive and more mobile than Bledsoe. With a much worse team.
So please can the baloney about Drew Bledsoe being better than Kelly Holcomb.
349/550, 63.5%, 3867 yds, 7.0 yds/att, 29 tds, 22 ints, 1.32 td/int, 19.0 att/td, 32 sck, 17.2 att/sck, 85.2 rtg.
Drew Bledsoe's Buffalo stats
905/1531, 59.1%, 10,151 yds, 6.6 yds/att, 55 tds, 43 int, 1.27 td/int, 27.8 att/td, 140 sck, 10.9 att/sck, 79.2 rtg.
So, in every significant category, Kelly Holcomb through his four years at Cleveland was a better qb than Drew Bledsoe in his three years here.
And he was playing through the turmoil of the Tim Couch situation and the ineptitude of Butch Davis.
Whereas for three years here, Drew was handed everything on a silver platter.
Holcomb was significantly more accurate, more productive and more mobile than Bledsoe. With a much worse team.
So please can the baloney about Drew Bledsoe being better than Kelly Holcomb.