PDA

View Full Version : Quentin Griffin to work out for Buffalo



pintonick96
10-18-2005, 12:01 PM
From KFFL:

Bills | Griffin to Work Out
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:08:57 -0700
<A href="http://www.kffl.com/link/3">Bill Williamson, of the Denver Post (http://www.kffl.com/link/184), reports free agent RB Quentin Griffin (http://www.kffl.com/player/6190/nfl) (Broncos) will work out for the Buffalo Bills (http://www.kffl.com/team/9/nfl) soon.

Italian Stallion
10-18-2005, 12:04 PM
i guess he could help..Almost exactly like S. Williams.

Why did Denver cut him?

Iehoshua
10-18-2005, 12:08 PM
Better question is, since we have Shaud Williams, why do we need Griffin?
:confused:

mchurchfie
10-18-2005, 12:18 PM
Better question is, since we have Shaud Williams, why do we need Griffin?
:confused:
:bf1:I would rather see them be working some DTs, DEs, or OLs.:crap:

Demon
10-18-2005, 12:21 PM
I've always liked the kid so i'm happy. But it does bring up a good question, why do we need him. lol

dannyek71
10-18-2005, 12:28 PM
isnt he and shaud essentially the same player?

I agree, work out som OL, DT

Jersey1031
10-18-2005, 12:33 PM
I've always liked the kid so i'm happy. But it does bring up a good question, why do we need him. lol


Absolutely, the running game isnt our problem...

justasportsfan
10-18-2005, 12:43 PM
what's wrong w/ Gates?

AndreReed83
10-18-2005, 12:46 PM
I love Q. He's always been a hard working player and has some pretty good talent. He got cut in Denver because he was the odd man out of a stable of running backs. He also has very good hands and doesn't mind blocking. I don't really know why we would look at him, but he would work his tail off here, or anywhere he goes.

camelcowboy
10-18-2005, 01:19 PM
Quentin is faster then shaud and has better hands, He would be a good Third down back. Our third down package. Of Evan, Moulds, Parrish, Q, would be pretty scary.

Mr. Cynical
10-18-2005, 01:24 PM
Better question is, since we have Shaud Williams, why do we need Griffin?
:confused:

Ask TD the Genius. :homer:

Demon
10-18-2005, 01:54 PM
Esspicially since Shuad Williams is having a solid season. I donno, Griffin is a good player though i won't lie, he can be huge in some games.

Anyone remember Griffin is the Broncos home opener last season? Something like 150 yards 3TD's if i remember correctly. I'm in class right now so i don't feel like researching it.

BAM
10-18-2005, 02:33 PM
I definitely don't think it would hurt bringing im in.

DraftBoy
10-18-2005, 02:39 PM
ST in college, also a great 3rd down option in obvious passing downs, Willis's hands are still too suspect to be a sure handed player. Also prolly more agility than any back we got on the team, if not pure speed. Warrick Dunn type.

lordofgun
10-18-2005, 02:44 PM
There's gotta be a reason NE decided on Zereoue over Q. If he was that good, he would have stuck somewhere by now.

dannyek71
10-18-2005, 03:21 PM
what's wrong w/ Gates?

he stinks. Cant run inside at all.

Tatonka
10-18-2005, 05:09 PM
griffen looked like dog **** in all but like 2 games for denver.. if he cant run in denver.. he aint doing **** here..

screw bringing in another undersized injury prone rb.. how bout we get help where we actually need it! novel idea, i know.

OpIv37
10-18-2005, 05:13 PM
screw bringing in another undersized injury prone rb.. how bout we get help where we actually need it! novel idea, i know.

It is a novel idea. However, it is not a good fit at all for Donahoe's philosophy of trying to overcompensate for weaknesses in some positions by having good players at other positions. For example, if you have a safety who can blitz, why on earth would you need defensive ends? If you have a mobile QB and a top-notch RB, why the hell would you need a right guard or right tackle?

justasportsfan
10-18-2005, 05:15 PM
he stinks. Cant run inside at all.Say what? So why did we get rid of Lee then? Sorry, majority of those who've seen him play were impressed by him including myself.


My guess is Q. for ST.