By Mark Weiler
First, under what circumstances does starting a totally inexperienced QB give any team their best chances of winning insofar as QB play is concerned?
Secondly, and dependent upon your answer to the first question, why was it such an urgency to trade away two picks, one nice 2nd-rounder along with a very viable (for most teams) 5th-rounder in order to obtain JP Losman in last year's draft? In other words, what was the urgency, as stated by you at the time, in drafting Losman? Could the Bills have not put an '04 2nd and 5th rounders coupled with an '05 1st-rounder to better use in the interests of "our best chances of winning this season?" As well, Aaron Rodgers was available with that selection this year.
Thirdly, at what point does a QB with minimal to no experience "give their team the best chances of winning?" Namely, after how many seasons of watching below average QBs ahead of him?
Lastly, so many of your critical assessments of the team appear to be so far off base that they would be laughable if it were not such a travesty and disaster. Millions wasted on Bledsoe with the mistake repeated, continued suggestions that the offensive line is anything other than offensive, the "Losman situation" now insofar as this season goes, the defensive line, extremely questionable coaching and play-calling, etc. How do you reconcile and justify these gross errors in judgement that essentially boil down to the primary reasons why the Bills are bad?"
First, under what circumstances does starting a totally inexperienced QB give any team their best chances of winning insofar as QB play is concerned?
Secondly, and dependent upon your answer to the first question, why was it such an urgency to trade away two picks, one nice 2nd-rounder along with a very viable (for most teams) 5th-rounder in order to obtain JP Losman in last year's draft? In other words, what was the urgency, as stated by you at the time, in drafting Losman? Could the Bills have not put an '04 2nd and 5th rounders coupled with an '05 1st-rounder to better use in the interests of "our best chances of winning this season?" As well, Aaron Rodgers was available with that selection this year.
Thirdly, at what point does a QB with minimal to no experience "give their team the best chances of winning?" Namely, after how many seasons of watching below average QBs ahead of him?
Lastly, so many of your critical assessments of the team appear to be so far off base that they would be laughable if it were not such a travesty and disaster. Millions wasted on Bledsoe with the mistake repeated, continued suggestions that the offensive line is anything other than offensive, the "Losman situation" now insofar as this season goes, the defensive line, extremely questionable coaching and play-calling, etc. How do you reconcile and justify these gross errors in judgement that essentially boil down to the primary reasons why the Bills are bad?"
Comment