Tweet
I support getting rid of Donahoe after this season, unless he commits himself to bringing in support for this team. If he goes, will the new GM want a new coach and a new staff? If that's the case, won't it be a rebuilding year once again? I'm so confused on what I want done with this team. What do you think? (this ijmo).
-
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
to go to the JP Losman transition and fix our aging defense, we are going to have to rebuild anyways. I have no problem with rebuilding as long as it is with a new GM and a solid head coach, instead of some crappy coordinator.
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
I'm not totally sure yet as to what the true direction should be, I think we need to see the rest of the season to know for sure.
Right now though...
1. Get rid of Donahoe
2. Bring in a new GM who is a proven winner (whether he was a GM before or player personnel ala Heckert).
3. Evaluate Mularkey. Right now he should get the hook.
4. Bring in a new coach, somebody who is not a "yes boy." Could either be a proven winner as a head coach, or a bright mind like Brad Childress.
5. Get rid of guys and/or make guys take pay cuts who are not producing and/or getting old. Moulds, Fletcher, Mike Williams, Teague, Campbell, Posey, Vincent, etc. should be on the short list. Some of these guys can still produce, they will have to be evaluated.
6. Rebuild the offensive line.
7. Bring in a solid defensive tackle and a true run-stopping defensive end (unless Kelsay, Denney, and Schobel step up).
8. Bring in a young QB (if possible!) either through the draft or free agency to compete with Losman. Don't give Losman the job uncontested again. Give him every chance to earn it, but MAKE him earn it. If the other guy beats him out fair and square and turns out to be a good quarterback, so be it. May the best man win. I'm not saying to bring in a Leinart, but maybe a guy like Schaub, or draft a young guy in the 3rd round or something. This point hinges on whether Losman comes back in this season with any substantialness and shows improvement or not.
9. Find another tight end. Hopefully Peters and Everett develop, but until then, we need somebody.
10. Rebuild the other positions through youth. Defensive backs, linebackers, offensive line, wide receivers, etc.
11. Try to re-sign Clements. If we can't, bring in a bunch of young guys.
Just some ideas...
Jon
Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
One thing that your "fantasy" seems to forget is the salary cap. The Bills are limited in what they can do and who they can cut. Ask clump, he'll tell you.Originally posted by Mudflap1Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
I understand that Mikey, I'm not am imbecile. Rome wasn't built in a day. However, there are a lot of teams out there that ARE making these adjustments, so there is a way to do it, we just need somebody who is qualified in doing so, and building a winner.
For instance, keeping Clements may not be something that is do-able. So you bring in young guys. Trade away some players where you can pick up cap room. Get rid of the dead wood.
It can be done.
JonComment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
If the Bills let Fletcher go, I will throw myself into highway traffic. He doesn't need to take a paycut, he needs to stay right in the middle. Some of you have no idea how crucial he is to our defense. With out him Spikes and Posey are toast.I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
"Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.
Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
Puppets never know what is going on.. They just do what the strings tell them to do. Sort of like upChuck DICKerson disciples,Originally posted by Mikey82Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
He's underrated, underappreciated.Originally posted by MBBedardComment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
Isn't Fletcher's contract coming up soon? We can't overpay to keep him around either. I like the guy, and he's given us some good years, but if the team is being rebuilt, they are being rebuilt, and he will be a guy on the fence as to whether he returns or not. He's in his 30s already, isn't he?
JonComment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
Yeah cause there are soo many good MLBer's in the NFL. He has shown no drop off in play, and because of his age a new contract would not break the bank. By losing Fletcher you turn Takeo into a tackler not a playmaker. There is no way he should be allowed to leave unless he has a legitimate replacement.Originally posted by Mudflap1I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
"Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.
Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
I'll agree with that statement.There is no way he should be allowed to leave unless he has a legitimate replacement.
My point is that if a new front office is brought in, they may choose to just rebuild the team (yawn... again!). If that happens, then it's open season on a lot of veterans. I like London, I'd like to see him stick around, he's a good player, but that's the way it goes. Same thing with Moulds, good player, getting old, may not be in the rebuilding plans. Same with the other guys I listed (although some of the ones I listed do indeed suck, see: Williams, Mike).
JonComment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
I've seen a lot of people mention Scott Pioli. Well:
"The man who helped build the team who has won three of the last four NFL Super Bowl titles, the New England Patriots, has received a contract extension to continue in his job as VP of player personnel. Forty year old Scott Pioli who joined the team in 2000, the same year as head coach Bill Belichick, was given a ringing endorsement by Pats’ chairman Bob Kraft. Terms of the new deal were not disclosed. His old contract was due to expire at the end of the 2006 season.
Last season, the Scott Pioli Bill Belichick combination made NFL history by becoming the first duo of head coach and player personnel director to win three titles in four years. The previous season, Pioli became the youngest person ever to win the NFL Executive of the Year award, receiving the honor in both 2003 and 2004. He has been one of the most sought after executives in the league in the past couple off-seasons, but asserted that he was committed to the New England Patriots and wouldn’t consider another offer until his current one with his current team expired.
So much for considering other offers. For now, Scott Pioli will remain with the Patriots"
I'm sure I'm not the only one who knew this had already happened...?
Unless it's possible for Pioli to leave the VP spot and take over as GM and President even though hes under contract?Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
Not sure what the rules are -- I would imagine he might be able to leave if he got promoted to President and GM with another team, but would he want to? Don't know...
Heckert is logical. He is under Banner and Andy Reid in terms of personnel, but has a big hand in the process. He'd be a great guy to bring in for a promotion.
JonComment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
I would agree. IMO, the Eagles are the deepest team in the NFL. The only other teams that even compare are the Steelers or Patriots. I would love to see anyone from Philly's front office to come here to the Bills.Originally posted by Mudflap1
The Vikings also seem to be doing a house-cleaning, and their Front Office could be replaced by the choice of their new owner. If the Bills don't jump on it quickly, I would be willing to guess that the Vikings will be looking toward to the Eagles front office to be the replacement. (Just a guess)Comment
-
Re: If we Get Rid of Donahoe
Agreed.
JonComment
Comment