WR? or RB

[camelcowboy]

I need two RB? Two receivers

or One RB Three Receivers


RB Wills McGahee VS Pats, " Never a good game for the bills"
RB Rudi Johnson at Home VS The Packers "He's a Lock"

WR-Andre Johnson VS cleveland "Underachieving Player Vs a Bad Pass D"
WR- Roy Williams VS Chicago "Had two TD last time Teams meet, Garcia at QB"
WR- Burress VS Redskins- My Best receiver VS a good Defense :crap:
WR- Lee Evans VS Pats "I don't thinks so"
WR- Terry Glenn VS Arizona " I hate depending on Drew Glenn has been Inconsistant at best, vs a crappy D"
WR- Mike Clayton VS 49ers "Even with Chris Simms tempting, 49ers pass d :down:"

I need some guys, what combos would you roll with.

[Meathead]

Since I already played you, and won, I don't mind helping.

This one is easy.

RB's are more consistent scorers than WR's. So it depends on the situation which one you should play.

Usually you want to go with a featured RB because they rarely get less than 8 points or so. But a WR can get 0-20 pretty easily.

Conversely, if you're a considerable underdog you usually play WR's because they have a higher ceiling than RB's.

So ...

RJohnson
McGahee
Burress
Glenn

[kardshark19]

i agree with meathead

[chubluv]

Ditto on what Meathead & Kardshark said.

[PUCKER]

Ditto on what the other 3 said. :dizzy:

[Sabre Ally]

Yep, I agree too :D

[The King]

No brainer.