A look at Miami's 2003 cap (LONG)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clumping platelets
    • Jun 2024

    A look at Miami's 2003 cap (LONG)

    I'll move this later!!! This is what I posted at FinHeaven



    Link provided because I've updated my post there!

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Just an update for my Fishy friends

    Even though I'm a Bills fan, when it comes to the draft or the cap, I'm unbiased. Many of you will not believe that, but it is true. I offer my numbers that I maintain from a spreadsheet I've kept on the Fish (and of course my Bills) for 2 seasons. I don't need to keep one of the Pats because there is one available at www.patsfans.com/miguel . I'm going to try the Jets cap this offseason and keep track of the AFC East so as to be an informed nuisance

    I presently have Miami $2.081 million OVER the projected 2003 cap of $73.9 million with 51 players signed. However, the recent extension of the DirecTV deal may lead to an increase in the cap number to as much as $76 million. We will all know in a couple of weeks.

    According to www.nflpa.org and other sources, the follwing players are UFAs: DE Bowens, WR C. Carter, TE D. Clark, OT Dixon, RB Edwards, WR Gadsden, LB Gaylon, FB Konrad, CB Miranda, P Royals, OT B. Smith, OT Spriggs, and TE Weaver. RFAs: S Freeman, S Gamble, DB R. Green, DE Ogunleye, and DT Haley. EFAs: WR A. Johnson RFA FB Deon Dyer was already re-signed to 2 yr deal with salaries of 450K and 535K, I assumed $100,000 signing bonus)

    Recent information indicates that Miami wants to keep Dixon, Gadsden, Konrad, and Royals. Possibly Bowens and Weaver. UFAs gone will likely be Carter, Clark, Edawards, Gaylon, Miranda, Smith, and Spriggs. RFAs and EFAs that are likely be retained: all except Green. Each player must be tendered prior to the start of the 2003 League Year (end of February). Minimum qualifying offers are likely to be as follows:

    S Freeman (5th rd compensation): $615,000 (approx. )
    S Gamble (no compensation): $615,000
    DT Haley (7th rd compensation): $615,000 (Is he worth 1st rd tender??)
    DE Ogunleye (no compensation): $615,000 (He is likely to receive 1st rd tender of approx. $1.5 million)

    WR A. Johnson (EFA): $330,000

    This would impact the cap as follows: It increases the number of players signed (tendered players are consider signed because the tender amount counts vs. cap). Miami would now have 56 players signed. Only the top 51 salaries count. Each of the above tenders are greater than the 5 lowest salaries, thus each adds to the cap. 615K+615K+615K+1,500K+330K=$3.675 million. This is offset by the 5 lowest salaries totalling $1.125 million. This effectively adds $2.55 million to the cap, thus Miami now has 56 players signed (51 top salaries count vs cap) and are $4.631 million OVER the projected $73.9 million cap

    Next step: Miami must be under cap by March 1st. I'll look at how they can do this. The following players are potential salary cap cuts (cap savings):

    QB Ray Lucas ($750,000) with dead cap of $266,000
    WR James McKnight ($420,000) with dead cap of $1.08 million
    OL Todd Perry ($300,000) with dead cap of $900,000
    LB Derrick Rodgers($600,000) with dead cap of $1.5 million
    C Tim Ruddy ($700,000) with dead cap of $1.6 million

    What does this mean? Basically, when a player is released prior to June 1st in any League Year, any remaining bonus amortization from future years is accelerated into the year of release. Thus, Brock Marion(approx $1.2 million) and Jamar Fletcher (approx. $1 million) are not on the list because their release would ADD to the cap in 2003. Trading a player at any time during the offseason results in the same acceleration of the bonus, thus I doubt that Fletcher will be traded. He could be a candidate for release after June 1st and it would save $200,000.

    The total for the 5 players listed is $2.77 million. HOWEVER, with the uncertainty on the OL with FA and injury concerns of Jaime Nails, I do not believe Perry is a true candidate for release. Ruddy has a $450,000 roster bonus, $1.85 million salary, and $800,000 bonus in both 2003 and 2004. Thsu, he only saves $700,000. Miami may be forced to release him in order to get under the cap. I will only release Lucas, Rodgers, and Ruddy. That saves $2.05 million. Miami now has 53 players signed and are still $2.581 million OVER

    Since y'all are still $2.581 million OVER, restructuring/extensions are the next option. Follwing players to extend: LB Zach Thomas That's it!!! Why? Well, no one else can be extended without adding to the 2003 cap. Players like Taylor and Madison already have long term deals with HUGE bonus amortization. Suratin could be extended because he has 3 years left, but the primary target would be Zach Thomas. He has 1 yr left with salary of $4.7 million and bonus amortization of $2.306 million. His cap number is $7.06 million. No matter what happens, that $2.306 million cannot be changed. The minimum veterans salary for Zach is approx. $675,000 (7-9 years service). So, that's $2.981 million. The reports of a $12 million signing bonus are moronic!! Even if his deal were to be extended by 6 yrs, the resulting cap number for 2003 is $4.695 million and that saves only $2.365 million. That HUGE signing bonus would seriously hamper future cap years. Zach Thomas is 30 or 31 yrs old, no way that Spielman, if he's as good as he's said to be, gives him that type of bonus. I will give him a $7.2 million bonus to extend deal 5 yrs (that's 6 yrs total), but also include roster bonuses later in the deal that if not paid make him an UFA. The resulting bonus amortization is $7.2 million/6 yrs=$1.2 million. His new cap number is $4.181 million and his extension saves $2.879 million. Miami still has 53 players signed and now are $298,000 UNDER the cap

    I'll end this now because many of you are getting dizzy

    Just some ending notes:

    1) Miami could still have a "debit" on the 2003 cap due to NLTBE incentives not applicable to the 2002 cap. Miami's "debit" in 2002 was $2,633,052. If Miami has a similar cap adjustment ("debit"), then another $2.3 million in cap space would need to be found in order to just be cap compliant!

    2) Miami, as do many teams, really need the new DirecTV deal to increase the cap. Early projections are about $2 million.

    3) Restructuring contracts lead you into cap hell. Right now, Miami is in cap jail. Thus, looking to Taylor and Madison to restruture again, isn't a sound strategy but may be necessary.

    4) It may be better is release Zach Thomas due to the cap and find a younger, bigger MLB

    5) Miami is not going to be a major player in FA prior to June 1st, the cap space is just not there. They also do not have much flexibility.

    6) After June 1st, Miami could release players and spread out the bonus amortization over 2 yrs. This could free up cap space to add inexpensive UFAs going into training camp


    I'll continue to update y'all as new information becomes available!

    (My sources are numerous media articles, nflpa website, and MiamiDonW from kffl (who I think is aqua on this site )




  • Earthquake Enyart
    Legendary Zoner
    • Jul 2002
    • 27521

    #2
    Boy that's a darn shame.

    I think they should release Thomas and keep Lucas.

    Comment

    • clumping platelets

      #3

      Comment

      • SABURZFAN
        short bus extraordinaire
        • Jul 2002
        • 50747

        #4
        if they release surtain and madison,they'll be WELL under the cap.
        Originally posted by yordad
        Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

        Comment

        • SABURZFAN
          short bus extraordinaire
          • Jul 2002
          • 50747

          #5
          OOPS!!!i forgot to add thomas and taylor too.
          Originally posted by yordad
          Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

          Comment

          • clumping platelets

            #6
            While that would be wunderbar, most of those players cannot be released because it would INCREASE the cap due to acceleration of bonus amortization. Zach Thomas could be released and they save $4.7 million.


            Miami fans are in denial. I do the work and they quote statements from 2 or 3 months ago. They refuse to understand that it's entirely possible that I'm closer to being right than they believe.

            Comment

            • Earthquake Enyart
              Legendary Zoner
              • Jul 2002
              • 27521

              #7
              What's new? They are always in denial. Why do you think they keep dragging up those '72 idiots?

              Comment

              • itsandthings
                Registered User
                • Sep 2002
                • 140

                #8
                Unfortunatly, as much as I wish what you did was true, it is a piece of fiction. Miami isn't in nearly the poor cap shape you think. They will have to restructure some contracts, but those contracts are for their good players. They also have to extend Zach Thomas, which will cost some cash, but make his contract very cap friendly.

                The truth of the matter is, Miami is in pretty good shape for 2003 and the near future. As long as the players they have signing bonus money invested in continue to play well, they are fine.

                Comment

                • Earthquake Enyart
                  Legendary Zoner
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 27521

                  #9
                  I don't believe you.

                  I believe clump.

                  Comment

                  • Captain gameboy
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 14287

                    #10
                    Miami is always in bad shape. Sometimes, it's just badder.
                    Last edited by Captain gameboy; 01-14-2003, 10:59 AM.

                    Comment

                    • clumping platelets

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Earthquake Enyart
                      What's new? They are always in denial. Why do you think they keep dragging up those '72 idiots?

                      So where are my errors?

                      Miami fans say I'm wrong and you say I'm wrong but nobody proves I'm wrong. I WANT NUMBERS!!!


                      They restructured Taylor and Surtain last year. Madison is clearly regressing on the field, he is signed through 2006 and it is greater than his 2003 salary, thus no savings unless they released him after June 1st, highly unlikely and is restructuring his deal.

                      Comment

                      • itsandthings
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 140

                        #12
                        It will take some time, but I will break it down for you.

                        Comment

                        • Judge
                          Registered User
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 1310

                          #13
                          Originally posted by itsandthings
                          Unfortunatly, as much as I wish what you did was true, it is a piece of fiction. Miami isn't in nearly the poor cap shape you think. They will have to restructure some contracts, but those contracts are for their good players. They also have to extend Zach Thomas, which will cost some cash, but make his contract very cap friendly.

                          The truth of the matter is, Miami is in pretty good shape for 2003 and the near future. As long as the players they have signing bonus money invested in continue to play well, they are fine.
                          Prove it- Clump's work and math are posted for all to see. Prove him wrong with facts and numbers!
                          Argue like hell. Keep it clean. And when it's over, shake hands and root for our team!

                          Comment

                          • Ebenezer
                            Give me a minute...
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 73868

                            #14
                            Are we all in agreement that Miami can avoid jail if they restructure deals?? IF so then they will be in jail in the future...I'll believe CP until proven otherwise.




                            For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                            Comment

                            • don137
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 7720

                              #15
                              These are the same Miami fans that said there was no stopping the Dolphins this year and implied the Super Trophy is a done deal.
                              It is humorous that they think they can go after a player like Colvin. Techinically they can but it will have to come at a steep price by cutting some good players...
                              Reality will soon set it on them. Until then let them continue to be disbelievers and insult you Clump and say you are wrong but can't back it up. What else would you expect from a fin fan?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X