A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain Obvious
    I can feel your anger.I can feel your hate. Give in to the DARK SIDE! With every neg you become MINE
    • Jul 2005
    • 1080

    A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

    Why do some posters think that TD can franchise Nate Clements and trade him to Washington? Because Gregg Williams is the DF coordinator? Heres why this won't happen

    1)Washington doesn't have a 1st Round pick in 2006
    2) Next year Washington will be carrying at least 15 million in dead cap space. How can they take on the kind of signing bonus Nate will want and salary?
    3) Washington drafted a corner in the 1st Round 2005(Carlos Rogers)
    4) How often are franchised players traded? (Peerless Price is the only example I can think of.)

    If Nate is franchised and traded, hes not going to Washington.

    Here to point out the obvious....
  • Italian Stallion
    Knows More Than You
    • Feb 2004
    • 1136

    #2
    Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

    He's going to the NYG....they will easily give up a first and then some.
    BILLS FOOTBALL

    SABRES HOCKEY

    METS BASEBALL

    I like cheeseburgers and eva mendes

    Comment

    • Captain Obvious
      I can feel your anger.I can feel your hate. Give in to the DARK SIDE! With every neg you become MINE
      • Jul 2005
      • 1080

      #3
      Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

      Originally posted by Italian Stallion
      He's going to the NYG....they will easily give up a first and then some.
      Don't know the Giants cap situation next year, but that is a team that could use a good CB like Nate. The Giants would be a more realistic destination than the Redskins.

      Here to point out the obvious....

      Comment

      • SeatownBillsFan21
        Registered User
        • Mar 2004
        • 2149

        #4
        Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

        agreed

        Comment

        • Sportsuser101
          Registered User
          • Feb 2005
          • 2705

          #5
          Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

          I think SD would be interested in him as well.
          Dareus - 1st Round Pick

          Comment

          • Billsouth
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 758

            #6
            Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

            cleveland... for their first and second. We draft..... Charlie Weis from Notre Dame with the first rounder and to appease TD... we draft the smallest receiver that North Dakota ST has with the second rounder
            "once a raider always a raider"

            Comment

            • capitolneal
              Registered User
              • Sep 2003
              • 825

              #7
              Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

              the Bills will sign him he is a Difference maker

              Comment

              • feelthepain
                All-Pro Zoner
                • Mar 2005
                • 4663

                #8
                Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                Originally posted by WILLIS21
                Why do some posters think that TD can franchise Nate Clements and trade him to Washington? Because Gregg Williams is the DF coordinator? Heres why this won't happen

                1)Washington doesn't have a 1st Round pick in 2006
                2) Next year Washington will be carrying at least 15 million in dead cap space. How can they take on the kind of signing bonus Nate will want and salary?
                3) Washington drafted a corner in the 1st Round 2005(Carlos Rogers)
                4) How often are franchised players traded? (Peerless Price is the only example I can think of.)

                If Nate is franchised and traded, hes not going to Washington.

                But Miami is 25 mill under the cap and will be working very hard to shore up the secondary...wouldn't it suck to have to face Nate twice a year on the hated fish side??? All I'm sayin is it could happen!!!

                Comment

                • Crisis
                  Registered User
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 12738

                  #9
                  Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                  Originally posted by feelthepain
                  But Miami is 25 mill under the cap and will be working very hard to shore up the secondary...wouldn't it suck to have to face Nate twice a year on the hated fish side??? All I'm sayin is it could happen!!!
                  It won't.

                  Clements won't just walk. If he does, TD will be lynched.
                  Originally posted by LOSman WINS
                  Vanek is Austrian not European
                  Originally posted by Prov401
                  Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
                  Originally posted by better days
                  I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

                  Comment

                  • feelthepain
                    All-Pro Zoner
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 4663

                    #10
                    Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                    Originally posted by Crisis
                    It won't.

                    Clements won't just walk. If he does, TD will be lynched.

                    Being a division rival you're probably right, however as much as TD seems to puzzle you Bill fans, I would be a little worried if I were you. I think Saban will not rest till the secondary is tops in the league and if that means getting Nate, I'm sure Sabans ok with that.

                    Comment

                    • mysticsoto
                      Too sober for this...
                      • Apr 2004
                      • 31439

                      #11
                      Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                      Originally posted by feelthepain
                      Being a division rival you're probably right, however as much as TD seems to puzzle you Bill fans, I would be a little worried if I were you. I think Saban will not rest till the secondary is tops in the league and if that means getting Nate, I'm sure Sabans ok with that.
                      If we franchise him, it will cost you alot to get him. And right now, you need your 1st rounder for a franchise QB of the future. You will have Ronnie Brown for many years to come and need a QB to go along with him. You have decent receivers for now, and this is that last remaining piece of the puzzle - besides getting new Olinemen and getting some youth in your defense. Clements would be good for you, but something tells me that Saban will prioritize a QB higher. I wonder if Saban likes Rivers? He'll be available next year...

                      Comment

                      • colin
                        Drew's my hero!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 2491

                        #12
                        Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                        san diego will trade one of their QBs for a pick, we might get one of their picks for nate, perhaps a mid first and a second.

                        i'd rather have nate, but we might not be able to afford him.

                        Comment

                        • ublinkwescore
                          Sab and TD are insignificant
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 24178

                          #13
                          Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                          Is it just me, or has Nate been getting burned a lot lately?
                          www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

                          Comment

                          • ParanoidAndroid
                            My battery is low and it's getting dark.
                            • Apr 2004
                            • 16862

                            #14
                            Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                            I'd rather have another first and second round pick, although it would likely be a 1st and 3rd. I'd still take the picks.

                            Of course there may be difficulty with signing two first rounders, but this coming draft is full of quality linemen, defensive and offensive. This is going to be an excellent draft.

                            Comment

                            • clumping platelets

                              #15
                              Re: A franchised Nate Clements to Washington?

                              Where do you get that the Redskins will have $15 million dead cap in 2006?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X