Playcalling is stifling the offense-

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101340

    Playcalling is stifling the offense-

    We get behind 3-0 and our moron coach abandons the run. Then there was that ridiculous play on 4th and 1- no doubt trying to emulate the TD scored on that play against Seattle last year. And then the stupid pitch to Shaud after the INT.

    The D is making huge plays to keep us in the game. Mularkey and Clements are doing everything they can to blow it.
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website
  • Cntrygal
    Visually stunning but camera-shy.
    • Jul 2002
    • 44884

    #2
    Re: Playcalling is stifling the offense-

    What was it???? WM had 8 runs in the entire 1st half - or something along those lines. Entirely too few.
    Originally posted by notacon
    The biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.

    For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com

    Comment

    • Drive 4 Five
      Registered User
      • May 2003
      • 2202

      #3
      Re: Playcalling is stifling the offense-

      I think that this statistic speaks volumes about our coaches.

      Point differential 2005 season:

      1st Qtr. +33
      rest of game: -64

      Talk about OFFENSIVE!

      Comment

      • Billzz
        Registered User
        • Sep 2003
        • 1131

        #4
        Re: Playcalling is stifling the offense-

        Originally posted by OpIv37
        We get behind 3-0 and our moron coach abandons the run. Then there was that ridiculous play on 4th and 1- no doubt trying to emulate the TD scored on that play against Seattle last year. And then the stupid pitch to Shaud after the INT.
        The D is making huge plays to keep us in the game. Mularkey and Clements are doing everything they can to blow it.
        Do you ever have anything positive to say?

        BTW not that I disagree with you.

        Comment

        Working...
        X