Tweet
Listening to Mularkey, he LOVES Fletcher. Hew ent on and on about his approach to the game.
Personally Im on the fence with him. I watched him get dragged for 1st downs by RB's today, miss a big tackle on Dillon in the backfield.
I just wonder about him going forward. But Mularkeys comments certainly are making me rethink my opinion on Fletch. If he has THAT strong of a mentality and leadership, thats a great thing. So, maybe hes back on my keeper list.
As far as Troy goes. He certianly said all the right things today. Hes anothert one that has looked falt out horrible with pathetic tackling and never seeming to make a play. But, he is talking the talk by saying they are playing for Mularkey and that they take responsibility for their play, that Mularkey isnt the one out there on the field.
Could these guys just be saying what we want to hear and then loafing and not playing like they can? maybe.
And, it probably wont matter at least as far as playing for Mularkey unless the reports about Ralph really liking him ARE true and he isnt fired.
I dont know. Maybe a complete gutting of the defense isnt that smart of a thing to do. Maybe Milloy, not Vincent is the odd man out, maybe Posey is gone but not Fletcher.
If TD goes, we get a REAL GM, and we hire a quality OC. Can we survive keeping Mularkey? Might it even be a good thing if these vets are truly like him that much?
The Moulds issues wont be a problem with Mularkey, Moulds is likely gone.
I cant disagree with canning Mularkey but lets not try to say keep Moulds and can Mularkey, because Moulds is probably gone no matter what. And if thats the case, if MUlarkey stays he has no issue with the vets, supposedly, after Moulds leaves.
Thoughts?
Personally Im on the fence with him. I watched him get dragged for 1st downs by RB's today, miss a big tackle on Dillon in the backfield.
I just wonder about him going forward. But Mularkeys comments certainly are making me rethink my opinion on Fletch. If he has THAT strong of a mentality and leadership, thats a great thing. So, maybe hes back on my keeper list.
As far as Troy goes. He certianly said all the right things today. Hes anothert one that has looked falt out horrible with pathetic tackling and never seeming to make a play. But, he is talking the talk by saying they are playing for Mularkey and that they take responsibility for their play, that Mularkey isnt the one out there on the field.
Could these guys just be saying what we want to hear and then loafing and not playing like they can? maybe.
And, it probably wont matter at least as far as playing for Mularkey unless the reports about Ralph really liking him ARE true and he isnt fired.
I dont know. Maybe a complete gutting of the defense isnt that smart of a thing to do. Maybe Milloy, not Vincent is the odd man out, maybe Posey is gone but not Fletcher.
If TD goes, we get a REAL GM, and we hire a quality OC. Can we survive keeping Mularkey? Might it even be a good thing if these vets are truly like him that much?
The Moulds issues wont be a problem with Mularkey, Moulds is likely gone.
I cant disagree with canning Mularkey but lets not try to say keep Moulds and can Mularkey, because Moulds is probably gone no matter what. And if thats the case, if MUlarkey stays he has no issue with the vets, supposedly, after Moulds leaves.
Thoughts?
Comment