HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

[Mr. Cynical]

He had TONS of time on that last throw and it was crap.

Buh-bye.

Put JP in.

[Devin]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

AHAHAHAHAHA a 3rd INT.

Mularkey is a genius.

Whatever those polesmokers got from the Bungals win last week is going to be negated this one.

[BAM]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

We're going to come back.

[Novacane]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

He's a career backup for a reason.

[lordofgun]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

10 years and he still can't get it done! End this awful expiriment now!

[Devin]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

We're going to come back.

Dont get me wrong I dont mind a win, id just rather JP was doing it.

[Iehoshua]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

I still like Holcomb.

...as a backup. However, if Moolarkey can't shake his love for him enough to understand he's a backup, then one of them must go (preferably Moo man).

[The_Philster]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

Dont get me wrong I dont mind a win, id just rather JP was doing it.

ditto

[lordofgun]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

Dont get me wrong I dont mind a win, id just rather JP was doing it.

Exactly. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I just can't get excited about a career backup leading us to a meaningless win when I know we'll never be anything but mediocre under his leadership.

[BAM]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

Horrible throw there Holcomb. Oh wait nevermind it was a TOUCHDOWN! Right back in it.

[gr8slayer]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

There is a reason why he has been a back up for the past ten years. Now everyone should know why.

[BidsJr]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

Horrible throw there Holcomb. Oh wait nevermind it was a TOUCHDOWN! Right back in it.

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut. Only a dope would ask for a blind nut hunter.

[TigerJ]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

In Holcomb's defense, the last two interceptions were touched by Bills first. They were admittedly bad throws, but the Buffalo recipients (Shelton and Campbell) could conceivably have made great catches and saved Holcombs butt. I sincerely hope the issues with Losman get resolved and he becomes Buffalo's starter all things considered.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

In Holcomb's defense, the last two interceptions were touched by Bills first. They were admittedly bad throws, but the Buffalo recipients (Shelton and Campbell) could conceivably have made great catches and saved Holcombs butt.

Don't try to reason with the clueless. They just hate Holcomb.

If Houston and Atlanta defenders could catch, JP would of had 7 more INTs this year. And those were passes that werent even tipped by Bills recievers and were right in the defenders hands.

[Novacane]

Re: HOLCOMB SUCKS. END OF DEBATE.

In Holcomb's defense, the last two interceptions were touched by Bills first. They were admittedly bad throws, but the Buffalo recipients (Shelton and Campbell) could conceivably have made great catches and saved Holcombs butt. I sincerely hope the issues with Losman get resolved and he becomes Buffalo's starter all things considered.

On the one to Shelton I agree. It was low but he could have had it or at least not thrown it into a Jets players arms.
The one to Campbell was uncatchable. It was high and behind him. He got a hand on it but that was not catchable.