Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillsSabresB.C.T. Fan
    All-Pro Zoner
    • Jan 2004
    • 4556

    Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

    Just watching the sports and WGRZ Ch 2 News sports director Ed Kilgore says that Nate will command 8 or 9 mill./season too much for the BILLS to spend on him. he also said that even though Moulds wants to return he thinks that he'll be a salary cap cut.
  • L.A. Playa
    Registered User
    • Aug 2003
    • 19295

    #2
    Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

    and the franchise tag costs 5.5 mil

    Comment

    • ublinkwescore
      Sab and TD are insignificant
      • Sep 2002
      • 24178

      #3
      Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

      So we franchise him, trade him to Houston and get Carr (after Houston restructures his deal) and a 5th rounder for giving him to Houston at a reduced rate.
      www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

      Comment

      • RedEyE
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 24661

        #4
        Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

        We will be fine without him.

        Comment

        • LtBillsFan66
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 35553

          #5
          Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

          Originally posted by RedEyE
          We will be fine without him.
          I'm not so confident. Unless we move Vincent back to corner.

          Comment

          • Kerr
            Hall of Fame Zoner
            • Feb 2005
            • 6656

            #6
            Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

            "The playmaker" is as good as trade bait. He'll likely be franchised then traded.

            Comment

            • lordofgun
              in charge of you

              Administrator Emeritus
              • Jul 2002
              • 48416

              #7
              Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

              Originally posted by ublinkwescore
              So we franchise him, trade him to Houston and get Carr (after Houston restructures his deal) and a 5th rounder for giving him to Houston at a reduced rate.
              Why exactly would we want Carr?






              <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>

              Comment

              • Devin
                The Octagon
                • Apr 2003
                • 23878

                #8
                Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                tag is 5-6 mil.

                If we want him he will be here at least 1 more year.

                Im not worried either way I just hope we get something for him.
                http://gridironjunkies.net/forums/index.php

                Comment

                • RedEyE
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 24661

                  #9
                  Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                  The way I see it the Bills DL can be reworked to handle the load next year, and FA should produce some decent DTs.

                  If Brick Ferguson doesn't fall to the Bills, trade down a couple spots, pick up another draft pick, and snag CB/S Jimmy Williams from VT. Then trade up the 2nd round pick into the bottom 1st for UGA OG Max-Jean Gilles.

                  Between McGee, Kevin Thomas, Lawyer Milloy, Troy Vincent and newly acquired Williams, I think we'll cover it.

                  Comment

                  • Crisis
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 12738

                    #10
                    Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                    Any chance of using Clements as trade-bait to move up to take Brick?
                    Originally posted by LOSman WINS
                    Vanek is Austrian not European
                    Originally posted by Prov401
                    Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
                    Originally posted by better days
                    I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

                    Comment

                    • clumping platelets

                      #11
                      Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                      Rumor is that the franchise tag for CBs will be lower in that range, but nothing is final yet. However, if the tag is only $5.5-6 million, the Bills would be foolish not to tag him. Let him play 2006 at the franchise tender and deal with him in 2007 with hopefully a new CBA

                      BTW: He will NOT get $8-9 million/yr......

                      Comment

                      • Iehoshua
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 12906

                        #12
                        Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                        Originally posted by lordofgun
                        Why exactly would we want Carr?
                        You mean you didn't hear? The phenom with a whopping 18-46 career record is Buffalo's new answer at QB!

                        Comment

                        • audio/s
                          Registered User
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 170

                          #13
                          Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                          T. McGee has been one of our best defensive players this year... next year, depending on who we draft our d frontline is anchored by schobel, LB's TKO and posey, DB's T. McGee and lawyer... and of course TV

                          Comment

                          • Mr. Cynical
                            Maybe?
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 9766

                            #14
                            Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                            Originally posted by billsfanone
                            I'm not so confident. Unless we move Vincent back to corner.

                            Vincent =

                            No way.

                            Comment

                            • LtBillsFan66
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 35553

                              #15
                              Re: Not looking good for Nate Clements to return

                              Originally posted by Mr. Cynical
                              Vincent =

                              No way.
                              k. Then who?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X