I just re-read an article in the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle from a couple days ago and spotted a line that makes me wonder. Maybe Mularkey was the problem with the offense all along and Clements was just a scapegoat. If that is the case, the offense won't get any better.
In some league circles, it's felt that Clements got a raw deal from Mularkey, who did no better calling plays for Buffalo's anemic offense. It's believed Clements was handed the job back for the final two games and Buffalo's production improved against Cincinnati and the New York Jets.
Comment