If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Wys....Alot of people have been asking you this question...
Re: Wys....Alot of people have been asking you this question...
Originally posted by 4thAndLong But, I have yet to see you answer.
Who could we of gotten who is better than Bledsoe?
I dont want a book with useless stats as an answer. Just tell me who.
"But, I have yet to see you answer."
NONSENSE! That's b/c you haven't been reading... Tsk, tsk!
And I've answered it a million times. I'll ask you two questions in retort, and if you answer them, then I'll answer this one, yet again! Just for you...
1. If you could have a horrible team everywhere but Vick on it, would you prefer that to say having the Giants? or Denver for example? If you like, you can also use Minnesota w/ Moss as the example.
2. What if I told you ahead of time that Drew was going to have 18 TOs in 7 games v. 5 of or divisional games and v. Philly and Tennessee, would you be happy with knowing that going into next season? Regardless of what happens in the other 9 games.
Both are simple Y or N questions. Post your answers and I'll answer this question for about the tenth time now.
Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!
Re: Re: Wys....Alot of people have been asking you this question...
Originally posted by Wys Guy
"But, I have yet to see you answer."
NONSENSE!
And I've answered it a million times. I'll ask you two questions in retort, and if you answer them, then I'll answer this one, yet again! Just for you...
1. If you could have a horrible team everywhere but Vick on it, would you prefer that to say having the Giants? or Denver for example? If you like, you can also use Minnesota w/ Moss as the example.
2. What if I told you ahead of time that Drew was going to have 18 TOs in 7 games v. 5 of or divisional games and v. Philly and Tennessee, would you be happy with knowing that going into next season? Regardless of what happens in the other 9 games.
Both are simple Y or N questions. Post your answers and I'll answer this question for about the tenth time now.
Oh, I dont really read those essays. I just scim through them.
1. I would take a team with Vick. You have a solid foundation, a great D coordinator, an all-pro LB, and alot of things to work with.
2. How would you tell me ahead of time, wys? What if Drew does good in those games?
Oh yeah, and here are facts from the Bills last season.
-We had 2 1,000 yard receivers
-We had a 4,000 yard passer
-We had a 1,400+ yard rusher
-We improved from 3-13 to 8-8, a 5 game difference
-Travis Had 13 TDs, and Centers had 2 TDs
-Our D was near the bottom of the league in points allowed.
Wys, is our offense really the problem?
OK. How mant passing TDs did we have w/ all of those yards in our 8 losses? I mean w/ all of those passing yards we surely must have put up quite a few points in those games, right? How many TDs were produced by this passing offense that had so many yards?
What if I told you that only 1 TD was produced for every 243 passing yards in those games? Would you be highly impressed?
As to you "D" question, you tell me:
V. G.B., the D allowed 10 points. Was the D the issue?
V. K.C., the D allowed 17 points. Was the D the issue?
V. the Jets in game #2, the D held the Jets to only 17 points that weren't off of TOs.
V. the Pats in game 2, the D only allowed 20 points that could have been attributed to them and only 10 points that weren't off of our TOs.
Was the D the reason we lost in those games? Or was it b/c we couldn't score more than 17 points in any of them?
12-4 if those losses had been wins. 10-6 if only two of those losses had been wins.
1. I would take Vick on any team. Every team in the league has something to work with...Especially the Bungles, with a real GM, IMO this could be a dangerous team...Dillon, O'Neal, Spikes, Simmons. So yes, I would take Vick on a team of scrubs. A team like the Giants isn't going anywhere the next couple years.
Oh, and the GB game...Weather. After the game Favre said it was the worst conditions he's ever played in...And the first INT was all Price...He should've had that one.
KC game...Officiating costs us this game....And poor play calling from Gilbride.
Wys, if you really expected us to be 10-6, or 12-4 this year...Then you're not being realistic. Re-building is a process, it's not something that happens in one year.
Tweet
:
Comment