The Bills have a lot of work to do in regards to the cap. I wonder what is the first day this year?
When is the first day of free agency?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mysticsotoLecter is right in everything he said.
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Thanks DL. March 3rd. Barely over a month. Sweet! I know the combine got moved up some.
On Feb 8th we can franchise clements. I say don't wait. Franchise then deal with him. Try to have a trade worked out so we can pull it off about 12:01 am on march 3rd and get his number off of our cap.
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by patmoran2006I'm not sure if Franchising Clements and then trying to trade him is a great idea.
I know this much, with all the interior help we need combined with the piss poor season Clements had, he's not worth the money it will cost to keep him.
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by patmoran2006I'm not sure if Franchising Clements and then trying to trade him is a great idea.
I know this much, with all the interior help we need combined with the piss poor season Clements had, he's not worth the money it will cost to keep him.
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by mysticsoto??? Isn't that what we did with Peerless?
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by The_PhilsterWithout the Bills' permission, no other team can talk to or about any of our free agents until the free agency period begins.
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
I wouldn't expect this to happen until Marv and Dick have had a chance to at least attempt some negotiations with Nate. Obviously the best case scenario is for us to work out a long-term deal with Nate at a palatable $$. Seems like Marv should try to talk Nate off the ledge before we make it clear that he's tradebait.
Anyway, don't you think most teams will expect Nate to get tagged? I mean, it seems pretty silly to let him walk for nothing. If we negotiate smart, we make it clear that Nate's bad year was the result of the D unit's problems as a whole, and that he is still a top-5 corner in the league. He may not have as good a claim as the best 1-2 in the league as he did at the beginning of the season, but i think its still a fiarly strong case that he's in the top 5. If so, someone's going to be willing to eat his tag salary.
And I think someone will give us a #1 for him. I would be OK with a #2 also, so long as its a high #2. And I'd also be up for a trade for a veteran G, DT or DE.Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by Saratoga SlimI wouldn't expect this to happen until Marv and Dick have had a chance to at least attempt some negotiations with Nate. Obviously the best case scenario is for us to work out a long-term deal with Nate at a palatable $$. Seems like Marv should try to talk Nate off the ledge before we make it clear that he's tradebait.
Anyway, don't you think most teams will expect Nate to get tagged? I mean, it seems pretty silly to let him walk for nothing. If we negotiate smart, we make it clear that Nate's bad year was the result of the D unit's problems as a whole, and that he is still a top-5 corner in the league. He may not have as good a claim as the best 1-2 in the league as he did at the beginning of the season, but i think its still a fiarly strong case that he's in the top 5. If so, someone's going to be willing to eat his tag salary.
And I think someone will give us a #1 for him. I would be OK with a #2 also, so long as its a high #2. And I'd also be up for a trade for a veteran G, DT or DE.
The Giants drafting at number 25...atleast the 1st 2 top CBs will be gone. So I feel we should get more than just a 1st rd pick. Otherwise, the Giants come out winning, trading a low 1st rd pick for a top/decent CB with good pro experience...
Comment
-
-
Re: When is the first day of free agency?
Originally posted by mysticsotoAll I'm saying is to handle it like we did Peerless. Allow other teams to talk to him, so they don't get their heart set too quickly in getting a CB from the draft. Many teams were at the senior bowl this past week looking heavily at players and the Giants were reportedly looking strongly at some of the CBs that would be available. Let them talk to Nate from the onset so they don't make too many plans and then decide not to even consider Nate. But that doesn't mean Marv isn't trying to negotiate something with him either. In the mean time, make alternate plans just in case we will not have him next year. To tell you the truth, I consider Nate a decent CB, but not an elite one, and so I won't be too upset if we lose him. But the price better be worth it...
The Giants drafting at number 25...atleast the 1st 2 top CBs will be gone. So I feel we should get more than just a 1st rd pick. Otherwise, the Giants come out winning, trading a low 1st rd pick for a top/decent CB with good pro experience...
Comment
-
Comment