Tweet
as i have said repeatedly the bills are not dumb and will look to keep both. neither is the problem that so many on this board think they are. top 10 wrs and top 10 cbs DONT GROW ON TREES!!!!!!
-
-
Re: clements and moulds
Who is the Top 10 WR you're talking about? It certaintly isn't Moulds.
-
Re: clements and moulds
I'm the top 10 receiver he is refering to.
One will stay and the other will go but that is life in the NFL most likely it will be clements. Since there is a ***** ton of WR FA out there this year the bills can use that to thier advantage.
With clements he doesn't fit the mold that marv wants. He seems to be all about himself kind of guy. With running a cover 2 you don't need a shut down corner you just need physical corners. So IMO Clements will be tagged and traded.
Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
Clements has to be tagged! Moulds is worth keeping after restructuring. We can't take more time to develop young players, we need to win now with some vets on the team.Send me some wings!
Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
how do you figure that EITHER ONE is top 10? They're both mediocre- Moulds may have been top 10 at one time but he's well into the downhill side of his career. Nate was completely exposed this season.Originally posted by djjimkelly
I don't understand your line of thinking at all. You're right that top 10 guys don't grow on trees, but we can get PLENTY of guys who can equal Moulds' and Clements' stats for much less money (which will help us plug the numerous holes on this team).
Clements and Moulds are NOT the answers. Neither of them are terrible and I wouldn't mind keeping them for reasonable money, but they are not worth tying up our cap when this team has so many needs.Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
I see there is no offseason for *****ing and complaining thats a 365 days a year thingComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
I will not deny that, however, I don't see what I'm complaining about here. I simply stated my opinion that Nate and Moulds aren't worth their cap hit. Where is their complaint?Originally posted by L.A. PlayaComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
most of your posts just kinda come off that way even if they arent intended like that kinda like that old SNL skit the whiners LOL JK OpComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
well I can find something to complain about if you want me to. In fact, go check the TZ.Originally posted by L.A. PlayaComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
the TZ and all forums been kinda weak latelyComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
i think it would be nice if we could kep both of them but i highley doubt we will have the cap space so i would say tag clements and release mouldsComment
-
Re: clements and moulds
thx for all the neg rep guys lol. but yes moulds IS A F>>>>ING top 10 WR.
lets go through who they are this is in no particular order
owens
harrison
steve smith
chad johnson
ward
holt
randy Moss( not last year)
now lets get into 8-15 a category moulds surely falls into!!!
moulds
santana moss (1 year as a top wr dont put him passed mr moulds in my book)
chambers (up and coming)
andre johnson(has potential to be better then moulds NOT YET)
jimmy smith(EXACT SAME AS MR MOULDS TO ME)
rod smith(EXACT SAME AS MR MOULDS TO ME)
plaxico burress(ill take a 5 years older moulds so who 20 other teams)
joey galloway( i make 10 big pass catches a year)
issac bruce( on serious down turn)
boldin or fitzgerald ( sorry not yet)
so NEG ME SOME MORE U MORONS I COULD GIVE A **** but this we lost 11 games last year is moulds fault and nates fault GET a life we have had a horse SH1T coach and pop warner o line for years now
also when your dline gets zero real pressure on QB we could have deion sanders in his prime out there and he would get burnt alot!!
if u guys wat ill break down the CB spot the top 10 toou know guy with most interceptions each year isnt the top CB thats the pro bowl chump who fans vote in!!!Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
every guy you mentioned is much better than moulds and every one had better stats in 05. You're living in the past. Moulds had some great seasons for this team despite poor surroundings most of the time, but that was the PAST. he's not worth 10+% of our cap for past performance- smart teams only give huge contracts to guys who back it up on the field.Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
oh and you forgot to come up with some BS to cover for the fact that Moulds became a locker room cancer this past season.Comment
-
Re: clements and moulds
no he isnt worth 10% of our cap but at a renogotitated value of lets say 6.5 mil cap he is definately worth that. i havent once said pay the man what he wants but he isnt trash. hes a 100 ball wr in a competant offense. mularky unfortunately has used him so wrong alot cant see that anymoreComment
Comment