Mitchy moo
03-02-2006, 09:58 AM
One reason was that revenue sharing, a point of contention among the owners, was not on the agenda, at least not at the start. The union insists that is needed for agreement and some owners agree.
Asked if there could be a deal without it, Buffalo's Ralph Wilson simply said no.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2351271
Hope all this greed doesn't screw up the league. One might think after passing baseball as the american pastime, they might not want to screw it up.
Asked if there could be a deal without it, Buffalo's Ralph Wilson simply said no.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2351271
Hope all this greed doesn't screw up the league. One might think after passing baseball as the american pastime, they might not want to screw it up.