A Realistic Trade Scenario

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patmoran2006
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
    • Dec 2005
    • 19840

    A Realistic Trade Scenario

    Few weeks ago, I would have NEVER been down with Buffalo trading the 8th pick away to Denver for their pair of No. 1's (22,29)

    I know Denver would LOVEEEEEEEE to get their hands on Vernon Davis, with or without T.O... after losing Trevor Pryce, even with Warren back, They'd love Broderik Bunkey.. With Bell and Dayne their only RB's now, they might even have a big interest in LenDale White..


    Now, especially if we sign Pickett and dont need Ngata, I would take that trade in a minute..

    YOu could pick up a starting safety at (Simpson, Bullocks, Maybe even Jimmy WIlilams) AND you can go either Nick Mangold or Charles Spencer, both STUDS on the line.

    Hypothetically.. Lets say this trade happened.. Buffalo could fill three starting spots in the first two rounds of the draft
    1a- Nick Mangold <-- Monster
    1b- Ko Simpson (solid safety) or even better, Spencer (wow those are two good young OL to build on)
    2- Maurice Stoval


    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE
  • Kerr
    Hall of Fame Zoner
    • Feb 2005
    • 6656

    #2
    Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

    Not bad. You know shanahan would like to get his hands on a shanon sharpe type TE. We might even have the chance of selecting chad jackson if he's still there.

    Comment

    • L.A. Playa
      Registered User
      • Aug 2003
      • 19295

      #3
      Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

      you could also get Mangold, and Darnell Bing

      Comment

      • patmoran2006
        Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
        • Dec 2005
        • 19840

        #4
        Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

        Jackson and Bing would be great pickups dont get me wrong...

        But hey if this aint a super bowl team next year.. Mangold and Spencer are just monsters in the making. Combined with an ever improving Peters that could be a real SICK 60% of the OL, and not just short term, for years to come.


        Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

        Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

        Comment

        • patmoran2006
          Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
          • Dec 2005
          • 19840

          #5
          Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

          Plus I think Jackson goes before 22 anyway now.. Dallas (even with TO), KC or SD one of them three are gonna nab him. Could be wrong, just a feeling

          Bing would still be there though..


          Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

          Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

          Comment

          • Night Train
            Retired - On Several Levels
            • Jul 2005
            • 33117

            #6
            Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

            I have a better idea right now. Trade Moulds, Wire and Benny Anderson to Cleveland for C Jeff Faine.
            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

            Comment

            • mysticsoto
              Too sober for this...
              • Apr 2004
              • 31439

              #7
              Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

              Originally posted by patmoran2006
              Few weeks ago, I would have NEVER been down with Buffalo trading the 8th pick away to Denver for their pair of No. 1's (22,29)

              I know Denver would LOVEEEEEEEE to get their hands on Vernon Davis, with or without T.O... after losing Trevor Pryce, even with Warren back, They'd love Broderik Bunkey.. With Bell and Dayne their only RB's now, they might even have a big interest in LenDale White..


              Now, especially if we sign Pickett and dont need Ngata, I would take that trade in a minute..

              YOu could pick up a starting safety at (Simpson, Bullocks, Maybe even Jimmy WIlilams) AND you can go either Nick Mangold or Charles Spencer, both STUDS on the line.

              Hypothetically.. Lets say this trade happened.. Buffalo could fill three starting spots in the first two rounds of the draft
              1a- Nick Mangold <-- Monster
              1b- Ko Simpson (solid safety) or even better, Spencer (wow those are two good young OL to build on)
              2- Maurice Stoval
              If that were top be done, I'd prefer to get something like:

              1a) Chad Jackson (or Brodrick Bunkley if Chad is taken)
              1b) Nick Mangold
              2) Davin Joseph / Gilles / Spencer
              3a) top Safety available - Pat Watkins maybe? (WR if no Chad)
              3b) LB ? best player available...

              Comment

              • Marvelous
                Registered User
                • Feb 2004
                • 2226

                #8
                Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

                22,29 isn't enough for #8. I wan't qa 2nd next year or a 3rd this year added.. It's very expensive to trade into the top 10, so why should it be affordable for us to trade down?
                GO BILLS!!! NE
                Magical Trevor

                Comment

                • SquishDaFish
                  Lets GO BUFFALO!!
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 17034

                  #9
                  Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

                  I agree I rather the 2 picks plus a 3rd or a 2nd next year.

                  Comment

                  • Gunzlingr
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 45976

                    #10
                    Re: A Realistic Trade Scenario

                    I wouldn't trade a moldy rice cake for bling. He is a troll
                    You think you're hot **** in a champagne glass, but you're really cold diarrhea in a Dixie cup!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X