Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

[ICE74129]

They draft in the teens I believe. They need a QB to groom behind Johnson. Swap firsts and make them give us thier 2nd round pick.

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

Ideal trade IMHO though is still #8, Moulds for both of Denver's first rounders.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

They draft 17th..

And they dont have a second rounder, they gave it to Miami in the Culpepper trade

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

Ideal trade IMHO though is still #8, Moulds for both of Denver's first rounders.

If your giving up 8th pick in draft and Moulds.. Denver would have to throw a third rounder in there as well..


I dont think any team wants to take on Mould's contract, I expect a team to wait until he's cut.. BEfore anyone would even think of trading for Moulds, Levy would have to give MOulds permission to speak a trade and the team would want to work out a new contract deal beforehand.

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

They draft 17th..

And they dont have a second rounder, they gave it to Miami in the Culpepper trade

Uh no... they have TWO. Miami gave the vikes thier 2nd rounder. Dude what are you drinking lately?

So the Vikes said 'Hey here is our starter AND our 2nd round pick for....Nothing'?

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

If your giving up 8th pick in draft and Moulds.. Denver would have to throw a third rounder in there as well..


I dont think any team wants to take on Mould's contract, I expect a team to wait until he's cut.. BEfore anyone would even think of trading for Moulds, Levy would have to give MOulds permission to speak a trade and the team would want to work out a new contract deal beforehand.

Moulds has a 6.089 mill cap that another team would re negotiate. He isn't going to make 6+ mill ANYWHERE. Next Denver is a 'Moulds' Away from possibly going to the Superbowl for the AFC (or at least contending for it). It's a Win for Moulds, the Bills and the Broncos. and NO I don't need another 3rd. Just get rid of moulds and get two starters with the two first round picks

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

I do love the Buffalo/Denver.. 8 for 22 and 29 trade though..

Because realistically Buffalo could get a center (Mangold) and guard (Spencer) for the next decade.. these guys are studly.. The more I think about it, the quicker I''ll pull that trigger on it.. You sign Fabini or Runyan through FA and that offensive line quickly becomes a strength of the team, not a weakness..

And you sign Pickett at DT and you draft a S and WR in rounds two and three.. Just like that, u got the makings of a much improved football team..

DO it Marv!

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

I am on the trade down and get more picks bandwagon. For a team like the Bills in the position they are in, that is the best option for them

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

ya I musta been drinking, got the second rounders wrong.. I dont like the trade anyway though... If I'm moving down from 8, I want two first rounders that Denver has..

I am officially on that trade bandwagon and taking Mangold and Spencer.

How's this offensive line looking in your eyes
Peters-SPencer-Mangold-Villarrial-Runyan.
Preston, Jermaine, Gandy as the backups.

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

ya I musta been drinking, got the second rounders wrong.. I dont like the trade anyway though... If I'm moving down from 8, I want two first rounders that Denver has..

I am officially on that trade bandwagon and taking Mangold and Spencer.

How's this offensive line looking in your eyes
Peters-SPencer-Mangold-Villarrial-Runyan.
Preston, Jermaine, Gandy as the backups.

Dont like it. Why? Too much youth on one side. I would rather have Fabini, Spencer, Mangold, Villarial, Peters. Let Gandy, Preston etc be backups.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

I'll take Fabini instead of Runyan too.. As long as Mangold and Spencer are on that line I'd be pumped..

So basically, I'm hoping Buffalo does three more things, and anything else would be considered a bonus
1- Sign Pickett to eliminate Ngata at 8
2- Sign Fabini to play LT
3- Trade with Denver.
That would be my dream 40 day period for us right now.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

Ice.. Or how about this.

Give up a third for Faine.. Cleve would make that deal before Marv could finish the sentence.

Make the trade with Denver and take
22- Chad Jackson
29- Charles Spencer.

Still got a second and a third round pick (S and best player avail period)
And you got Faine and Spencer on the line.. still sign Fabini.. And Jackson as your new 2nd WR.. thats pretty damn sweet to me.

Dammit.. Marv gets creative he can do some damage..

[ICE74129]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

I'll take Fabini instead of Runyan too.. As long as Mangold and Spencer are on that line I'd be pumped..

So basically, I'm hoping Buffalo does three more things, and anything else would be considered a bonus
1- Sign Pickett to eliminate Ngata at 8
2- Sign Fabini to play LT
3- Trade with Denver.
That would be my dream 40 day period for us right now.

[McGahee420]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

Uh no... they have TWO. Miami gave the vikes thier 2nd rounder. Dude what are you drinking lately?

So the Vikes said 'Hey here is our starter AND our 2nd round pick for....Nothing'?

maybe him a Ricky have been hanging out

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Why not entertain a trade with the Vikes?

I am on the trade down and get more picks bandwagon. For a team like the Bills in the position they are in, that is the best option for them

Im on the keep the 8th pick and pick the best player on the draft board regardless of position bandwagon.