I just had a talk with some Packer fans here at work. They both said that they would have rather kept Nall instead of Rogers on their depth chart. He has a good arm but is sort of clumsy (not very mobile). They also said he's lazy in practice and always has been (maybe this is why he was 3rd on the depth chart there?)
I'm sure we've all heard this before, but I thought it was interesting to hear that Packer fans would have rather kept him instead of Rogers. Maybe he has some potential, considering Rogers was highly spoke of and taken in order to replace Favre.
I'm sure we've all heard this before, but I thought it was interesting to hear that Packer fans would have rather kept him instead of Rogers. Maybe he has some potential, considering Rogers was highly spoke of and taken in order to replace Favre.
Comment