Rank your priorities

[Don't Panic]

Assuming we are done in FA until the draft (I figure that's a pretty safe bet), how important do you see our prioriteis come draft day? Considering position alone, where should we be looking?

For me, DT is #1, then OG, OT and S. Everything else is BPA.

This is why I'd like to see us trade down (extra 2nd) and get Bunkley with our 1st, Lutui with our 2nd, Simpson or Whitner with our other 2nd (one of them has to slide) and either Whitworth or Scott with our first 3rd. It would be all BPA from there...

Do you think other positions hold higher priority?

[oldno711]

Re: Rank your priorities

1-OT
2-DT
3-OG
4-SS

[Don't Panic]

Re: Rank your priorities

1-OT
2-DT
3-OG
4-SS

Does this mean Justice in the 1st if Brick doesn't fall to us (or we don't trade up for him)? Just curious... trying to feel out as many scenarios as possible with this.

[bigbub2352]

Re: Rank your priorities

I think u go OT, DT, G, SS we should trade down to get extra picks and take Winston Justice

[ublinkwescore]

Re: Rank your priorities

I'd go DT, OG, OG, SS - all day one picks. Our Tackles will be fine.

Or I'd go DT, OG, DE, SS.

[BigGabes23]

Re: Rank your priorities

I say:

LT
DT
OG
LB

Am I the only person who wants to move Gandy to LG?

[ICE74129]

Re: Rank your priorities

#1- New owner...

[oldno711]

Re: Rank your priorities

Does this mean Justice in the 1st if Brick doesn't fall to us (or we don't trade up for him)? Just curious... trying to feel out as many scenarios as possible with this.

considering position alone? Yes...although I'm not totally sold on Justice at 8. I don't think he's a Mike Williams, but I wonder how effective he'll be on the right side.

Outside of Brick, I think trading down and either going OT-DT-G-SS or DT-OT-G-SS is our best bet.

I can't believe it's in less than 2 weeks.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Rank your priorities

#1- New owner...

I haven't seen any mocks with an owner worth taking on day one!

[Jan Reimers]

Re: Rank your priorities

I'd say: DT
OT
SS
OG
LB

[Night Train]

Re: Rank your priorities

Mine would be DT, G, S, OT, DE.

As far as where they are picked, I don't care. It's not mando that a DT HAS to be picked in Round 1. There is depth in our positions of need and you need to let the Draft come to you by not reaching.

A trade down scenerio in Round 1 would net us an extra Day one pick, making it easier to fill holes.

[oldno711]

Re: Rank your priorities

There is depth in our positions of need and you need to let the Draft come to you by not reaching.

....unless "reaching" includes trading up a couple spots for Brick (if he's there at 6)

[Jan Reimers]

Re: Rank your priorities

Mine would be DT, G, S, OT, DE.

As far as where they are picked, I don't care. It's not mando that a DT HAS to be picked in Round 1. There is depth in our positions of need and you need to let the Draft come to you by not reaching.

A trade down scenerio in Round 1 would net us an extra Day one pick, making it easier to fill holes.

I agree. I would definitely take Huff if he were available in the first round, and a guy like McCargo in the second, even though I also think DT is our top priority.

[NC-BILLS44]

Re: Rank your priorities

McCargo would be a great pick in the second, provided DT isn't addressed in the first round.

[Jaybird]

Re: Rank your priorities

At #8 we should take huff or davis if they are still around. Their will be some dts available in the second, watson or harris. I am also not sold on the idea that we are done in free agency, or a trade of sort. with our first round pick i wouldnt be happy taking justice its way to early for him, and if hes the player that the team wants then trade down some spots.