PDA

View Full Version : FA WR Darrell Jackson - No. 2 WR



NC-BILLS44
02-07-2003, 01:01 PM
What about getting WR Darrell Jackson?

This guy is pretty good and shouldn't cost Buffalo a furtune.

Jeff 311
02-07-2003, 01:26 PM
nah it looks like there going to tag price

Earthquake Enyart
02-07-2003, 01:33 PM
Jackson is not going to be cheap. If fantasy football players know he is a quality WR, I think NFL GM's do too.

clumping platelets
02-07-2003, 01:38 PM
He's not UFA, he's RFA. Seattle will likely put at least the 1st rd tender and maybe even 1st & 3rd. Without our "original" 1st rd pic, Bills are shutout completely from RFAs given 1st rd tenders

WG
02-07-2003, 03:55 PM
IDK CP, you sure? They have Robinson as their first. They can't afford to keep both can they? Seems to me similar to us here.

I like Jackson too and don't think he'll sign for more than $2.5M per year or so. I'd take him in a NY second over Price at half the cost.



Originally posted by clumping platelets
He's not UFA, he's RFA. Seattle will likely put at least the 1st rd tender and maybe even 1st & 3rd. Without our "original" 1st rd pic, Bills are shutout completely from RFAs given 1st rd tenders

I wouldn't be so sure EE. Perceptions rule the day in the NFL and in 3 seasons Jackson has only put up 1 1,000 yard season even though most of his yards were in the last 8 games in '00 and he played #2 this year.

Tatonka
02-07-2003, 04:26 PM
DJ is a damn good receiver.. i would love to have him here... but i think seatle is smart.. they already have lost engram.. so they are down a 3rd WR now.. so that would leave them with 1 wr.. Koren robinson...

i am pretty sure, like cp said, and like i said before.. there is no way he gets out of seatle.. and if he does.. it wont be cheap.. a 1st or 1st and 3rd.

Bert102176
02-07-2003, 11:46 PM
hey how about Ike Hilliard:earpoke: :bduff:

Bert102176
02-08-2003, 12:18 AM
but I would really like Martay Jenkins he is fast and is a great return man also, would replace PP and Charlie Rogers 2 players in 1 and won't cost to overly expensive.

Novacane
02-08-2003, 07:58 AM
Originally posted by Jeff 311
nah it looks like there going to tag price


They won't tag Price. Pete Prisco says so. He's the only one reporting that and he is known for being wrong.

clumping platelets
02-09-2003, 03:50 AM
Tagging Price makes a lot of sense

clump:earpoke:Tom Donahoe


but ya hafta wait for why ;)

WG
02-09-2003, 02:04 PM
Originally posted by Fairway To Green



They won't tag Price. Pete Prisco says so. He's the only one reporting that and he is known for being wrong.

LOL Fairway!



Originally posted by Bert102176
hey how about Ike Hilliard:earpoke: :bduff:

Hilliard is a #3 or weak #2. He's got decent speed, but he's not a traffic guy or doesn't run the best routes. He's a WR that I'm relatively familiar with since he left Florida.

He's got decent size at around 5'11"/6', 200+. I'm not sure I'd want him except as a third, but for that he'd be strong and a great selection. We would have to make Reed the solid #2 IMO if we grabbed him. Might be a good reasonably priced alternative for us though.

NC-BILLS44
02-10-2003, 08:10 AM
I still think D. Jackson would be a cheaper alternative to PP. Also, in this offence he may be able to put up similar numbers.