interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ICE74129
    Legendary Zoner
    • Feb 2005
    • 10796

    interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.



    "With Willis and our young right tackle Jason, we feel like we can help our quarterbacks mature, make the game a little easier for them, if we can run the ball successfully, play-action pass, keep some people really honest and fearful of what we're going to do running the football," Jauron said.

    Mature? Make it easier for them? Sure sounds like JP or Nall to me.
  • Mr. Pink
    Peterman Sucks!
    • Mar 2006
    • 35303

    #2
    Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

    Or someone drafted come Saturday....be it Young, Cutler, Jacobs or Croyle.

    Comment

    • EricStratton
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 20893

      #3
      Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

      You've named two of the three so the chances of you being right is pretty good.

      Comment

      • ICE74129
        Legendary Zoner
        • Feb 2005
        • 10796

        #4
        Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

        Originally posted by EricStratton
        You've named two of the three so the chances of you being right is pretty good.
        Well lets see, I thought posters might be smart enough to catch that Holcomb doesn't need to mature much more at nearly 34 years old. I guess I was incorrect.

        Comment

        • ICE74129
          Legendary Zoner
          • Feb 2005
          • 10796

          #5
          Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

          Originally posted by FunTimesYaY!
          Or someone drafted come Saturday....be it Young, Cutler, Jacobs or Croyle.
          We arent' taking a QB regardless of who is there. Marv doesn't like the first round stigma and isnt' willing to wait 3-4 years for a kid to develop. We have a guy that has been given a whole 8 games in two years, and Nall. We need to see if they get it or not. If not, its a Veteran brought in next year.

          Comment

          • EricStratton
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 20893

            #6
            Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

            Originally posted by ICE74129
            Well lets see, I thought posters might be smart enough to catch that Holcomb doesn't need to mature much more at nearly 34 years old. I guess I was incorrect.
            So you're pretty much just talking to hear yourself talk.

            Thanks for the tip.

            Comment

            • OpIv37
              Acid Douching Asswipe
              • Sep 2002
              • 101312

              #7
              Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

              Originally posted by FunTimesYaY!
              Or someone drafted come Saturday....be it Young, Cutler, Jacobs or Croyle.
              oh please no....
              MiKiDo Facebook
              MiKiDo Website

              Comment

              • bigbub2352
                Registered User
                • Feb 2005
                • 5386

                #8
                Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

                I think JP will be starter so they can say we invested alot in him and we gave him the chance and he didnt work out so move on, Kelly will be on the bench and Nall will be in waiting at start of season, Craig Ochs will be on PRACTICE SQUAD and they might sigh a rookie FA after draft, i really dont see them taking anyone a t QB till next year
                XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

                Comment

                • ublinkwescore
                  Sab and TD are insignificant
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 24178

                  #9
                  Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

                  I'm tired of drafting QBs.

                  let's just build up our lines, and bring in a young veteran who does 'get it' - even if we have to trade an arm and a leg for him - then we sign him to a long term contract.
                  www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

                  Comment

                  • ghz in pittsburgh
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 5861

                    #10
                    Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

                    Some interesting info on this year's top 3 QB that I heard on a local radio station where they had a scout from a local scouting service. I forgot his name so I'll call him The Scout.

                    1) Matt Leinart: played pro-style offense in USC. Most complete QB of the bunch except arm strength. The Scout actually compared him to Jon Kitna - that's right Jon Kitna - fundamentally sound, normally making good decisions, just not scaring a defense like Carson Palmer does. So he's a safe pick and most ready to play right away.

                    2) Vince Young: great upside but won't be ready for awhile. He needs to change his mechanics and more importantly needs to learn to play QB other than shot-gun. Does not have Vick's athleticism to get-by in NFL but has better leadership and decision making than Vick at this stage. A long tern investment.

                    3) Jay Cutler. Somewhere in between of Leinart and Young in style and a notch below. Will take a couple of year to be ready and some GM feel that he's the kind of QB that will throw/score a lot of TDs but also 20 INTs a year.

                    Somehow I see Losman fit in what they described about Cutler. The question is, will 2006 be the year for him?

                    Comment

                    • Mitchy moo
                      Roways rooking ahread!
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 18380

                      #11
                      Re: interesting comment may be clue to who starts at QB.

                      Originally posted by ICE74129
                      Well lets see, I thought posters might be smart enough to catch that Holcomb doesn't need to mature much more at nearly 34 years old. I guess I was incorrect.
                      Holcomb was not going to be the starter anyways.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X