We pass on the top rated DT's and reach for a safety instead at #8 and won't trade down out of the spot.
Now we get rid of an extra pick and take a lower rated DT? This is very sad.
So instead we get a lower DT we also reach for and lose a draft pick?
So let me get this straight. We lose out on getting another 2nd round pick and reach for a safety instead that we could've gotten in the trade down or still got a good value on one in the 2nd round.
Had we missed out on him we still get one of the top 2 DT's and have an extra 2nd round pick. Now we trade up and lose one of our 3rd round picks to take a lower rated DT who is also a reach?
We could've had a either...
1- Safety(Whitner)
2- DT
2- OL
3- ?
3- ?
or
1- Top rated DT
2- Safety
2- OL
3-?
3-?
Instead
1- S(reach)
1- DT(reach)
3?
We turn 5 draft picks into only 3 draft picks and get a lower valued prospect at each position. I can't take this anymore.
Now we get rid of an extra pick and take a lower rated DT? This is very sad.
So instead we get a lower DT we also reach for and lose a draft pick?
So let me get this straight. We lose out on getting another 2nd round pick and reach for a safety instead that we could've gotten in the trade down or still got a good value on one in the 2nd round.
Had we missed out on him we still get one of the top 2 DT's and have an extra 2nd round pick. Now we trade up and lose one of our 3rd round picks to take a lower rated DT who is also a reach?
We could've had a either...
1- Safety(Whitner)
2- DT
2- OL
3- ?
3- ?
or
1- Top rated DT
2- Safety
2- OL
3-?
3-?
Instead
1- S(reach)
1- DT(reach)
3?
We turn 5 draft picks into only 3 draft picks and get a lower valued prospect at each position. I can't take this anymore.
Comment