Calculated Draft value for 2006

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mysticsoto
    Too sober for this...
    • Apr 2004
    • 31439

    Calculated Draft value for 2006

    All this talk got me thinking about how we could check to see the draft value of the Bills' entire draft and see whether our surprise late picks even out our "reach" early picks - using the draft value chart (link included below) I went to the draft pick value chart that is used to make trades. This is what I found:

    1a) Whitner at #8 is worth 1400 pts
    Whitner at the latest would have gone with Miami at #16 which was worth 1000 - possibly earlier, but we'll be conservative here. Net loss: -400 pts

    1b) Moved up to get McCargo. Our 2nd rd pick was at pick#42 = 480 pts. We moved up to #26 = 700 pts and lost our second 3rd rounder at #73 = -225. The net loss then was our second 3rd round pick = -225 since that is what we lost to be able to move up.

    Total loss so far: -400 + -225 = -625


    3) We ended up getting Ashton Youboty with our 3rd rd pick #70 = 240 pts. Many mock drafts had him anywhere in the mid/late 1st round. I will chose #25 as an "average" of when he might go. Pick#25 = 720. Net gain: 720-240 = 480 pts.

    Total loss so far: -625+480 = -145 pts


    4) Ko Simpson picked at: 105th = 84 pts. Most mock drafts rated him anywhere from the early 2nd round to late 2nd round. I'll choose the middle at pick#48 to rate him which is 420 pts. Net gain: 420-84 = 336 pts

    Total gain so far = -145 + 336 = 191 pts

    5) Kyle Williams was projected late 3rd round I'll even go so far as early 4th. Pick#134=39 pts. Early 4th round = Pick#100=100 pts. Net gain = 100-39 = 61 pts.

    Total gain: 191 + 61 = 252 pts.


    For picks second 5th rounder, 6th and both 7th rounders, I'd say they were about right and won't offer much either way even if we try to be more specific.

    However, we do need to include undrafted free agent Martin Nance who was projected anywhere between late 2nd and early 4th. I'll go mid 3rd as an average: The pick where we obtained him "undrafted" has no value point so I will pick the last value point on the chart for a 256th pick which is .4 pts. Mid 3rd round I'll place at around pick 80 which =190 pts. Net gain: 190-.4 = 189 pts.


    Total net gain: 252 + 189 = 441 pts.


    And that includes our 3rd rd loss. So overall, I think we came out on top despite what it may look like!!! We may have had what appeared to be reaches, but our other picks more than made up for them!!! People should therefore be happy that we actually got good draft value overall!!!

    Note: I do not include/add any "potential trade downs" at the beginning because that could cause the whole draft to change and affect who we would have taken later. As you can see, we gained alot with our 3rd and 4th round pick and a trade down could cause quite a change in a positive or negative way. Since this is not able to be determined, it is invalid to assume anything in either direction.


    Link to draft value chart:http://www.nfldraftworld.com/tvc.htm
  • Saratoga Slim
    Registered User
    • Jul 2005
    • 4154

    #2
    Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

    Interesting, I'll give you that. Yet another way of saying that we had a good draft on the whole. I concur
    Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

    Comment

    • BuffaloBillsStampede
      Registered User
      • Aug 2005
      • 1230

      #3
      Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

      Very cool way of looking at things
      SUPER MARIO PLEASE COME TO BUFFALO!!!!

      Comment

      • kgun12
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 11319

        #4
        Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

        Nice work! Still not sure I'm happy with the draft, but this does put a more positive light on it!
        Retired Air Traffic Controller
        USAF VETERAN
        DAV

        Comment

        • G. Host
          Banned
          • Jul 2002
          • 10298

          #5
          Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

          IF you believe in draft value chart (which I don't).

          I'd rather have picks I wanted wholeheartedly rather than more picks because they were "value" picks. There appears to be two philosphies - one is a lottery where you take a chance and the other is dedicated research possibly overpaying because you have players which you consider overrated.


          Non football example:
          I used to trade stocks in late 1980's. I dealt with an advisor who told me what stocks were valued based on history, mix, etc. I was losing money sometimes but told I was building up portfolio for future value. I took away control, told what stocks / funds I wanted and I was told I'd lose money. I turned $9K to $16K in less than 6 months which was more than 10x what I got in three years. Then I took out the money and was told I was losing out on large future gains. Two weeks the stock market colapsed.


          The broker was all about charts, values, etc. I choose what I considered excellent values despite paying more for stocks/funds than what broker recommended. If you do research well you can find gems like Bills USED to. Lets hope Marv's staff did so this time.

          Comment

          • Hamilton Billsfan

            #6
            Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

            Very Good!

            I always like it when someone can quantify such hard things as this.

            Comment

            • mysticsoto
              Too sober for this...
              • Apr 2004
              • 31439

              #7
              Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

              I think I've gotten enough feedback from this post that I'm going to make it into an article and have it posted in the Billszone front page for those that don't read the message boards...thanks everyone for the good comments.

              Comment

              • Jan Reimers
                Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                • May 2003
                • 17353

                #8
                Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                Good analysis. I thought our 3rd, 4th and 5th picks were outstanding, and your chart confirms it.
                Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                Comment

                • BillsFever21
                  Registered User
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 9067

                  #9
                  Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                  Youboty was a good pick in the 3rd round. I could care less where the mock drafts had him at. He was passed on 100 times before he was picked by the only draft that counts and that's the NFL draft.

                  It happens with tons of players every year where mock drafts has a player listed as a first round pick and they slip into the 2nd-4th round(or later) and the player ends up only being worth that 4th round draft pick.

                  These guys are not NFL GM's. I don't care if most of them have a player listed as a 1st round selection. If the NFL GM's pass on a guy 100 times before he is selected then that is his value and the mock drafts don't mean crap.

                  If he was this big time first round player like the mock drafts had him at I'm positive another GM would've taken him somewhere in the 2nd round if he would've been that much of a steal.

                  He was the 10th CB chosen in the draft. Who cares what the mock drafts had him at. If 32 GM's passed on him twice and 5 others 3 times, and was the 10 CB's selected in the draft then that was his true value.

                  If he was truly the 3rd rated CB in the eyes of the people who count in the draft like the mock drafts had him at then he wouldn't have been passed over 9 other times when a CB was selected. A GM would've seen his name on the list and took him way before that.

                  Basically what I'm trying to say is mock drafts don't mean crap. Just because some nobodies had him rated so high doesn't mean he should've been a 1st round selection. When you get that far in the draft and that number of selections the true value in the eyes of the professionals determines the players value.

                  I think he is a good selection in the 3rd round. He is a talented player from a big time school that develops good DB's. All I'm saying is he wasn't one of the top rated CB's in the draft like the mocks had him listed or he wouldn't have been the 10th CB drafted or made it into the 3rd round. He would've been selected way before that.

                  Comment

                  • mysticsoto
                    Too sober for this...
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 31439

                    #10
                    Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                    Originally posted by BillsFever21
                    Youboty was a good pick in the 3rd round. I could care less where the mock drafts had him at. He was passed on 100 times before he was picked by the only draft that counts and that's the NFL draft.

                    It happens with tons of players every year where mock drafts has a player listed as a first round pick and they slip into the 2nd-4th round(or later) and the player ends up only being worth that 4th round draft pick.

                    These guys are not NFL GM's. I don't care if most of them have a player listed as a 1st round selection. If the NFL GM's pass on a guy 100 times before he is selected then that is his value and the mock drafts don't mean crap.

                    If he was this big time first round player like the mock drafts had him at I'm positive another GM would've taken him somewhere in the 2nd round if he would've been that much of a steal.

                    He was the 10th CB chosen in the draft. Who cares what the mock drafts had him at. If 32 GM's passed on him twice and 5 others 3 times, and was the 10 CB's selected in the draft then that was his true value.

                    If he was truly the 3rd rated CB in the eyes of the people who count in the draft like the mock drafts had him at then he wouldn't have been passed over 9 other times when a CB was selected. A GM would've seen his name on the list and took him way before that.

                    Basically what I'm trying to say is mock drafts don't mean crap. Just because some nobodies had him rated so high doesn't mean he should've been a 1st round selection. When you get that far in the draft and that number of selections the true value in the eyes of the professionals determines the players value.

                    I think he is a good selection in the 3rd round. He is a talented player from a big time school that develops good DB's. All I'm saying is he wasn't one of the top rated CB's in the draft like the mocks had him listed or he wouldn't have been the 10th CB drafted or made it into the 3rd round. He would've been selected way before that.
                    I disagree with you - not on Youboty specifically, but in your assessment in general. By your way of thinking, no good value should ever fall into the lower drafts then. By all accounts, McGee has proven many critics wrong who had him ranked rather low, and yet he has become a great CB. We could also go with Tom Brady who was overlooked by many a GM and drafted as a 6th rounder - and yet, who doesn't regard Brady as one of the top QBs in the league today? I could go on...but b'cse someone gets dropped low on the list of being picked, doesn't mean their draft value is lower. There could be a host of reasons - like he doesn't fit another teams style of defense, or that the needs of the teams varied to another area such that he could not be picked at that point in time, etc. There are many variables and many players to evaluate and pick from. It's by no means as simple as: you didn't get picked therefore, you're really not that good as the previous mock drafts had you...

                    Comment

                    • BillsFever21
                      Registered User
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 9067

                      #11
                      Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                      Originally posted by mysticsoto
                      I disagree with you - not on Youboty specifically, but in your assessment in general. By your way of thinking, no good value should ever fall into the lower drafts then. By all accounts, McGee has proven many critics wrong who had him ranked rather low, and yet he has become a great CB. We could also go with Tom Brady who was overlooked by many a GM and drafted as a 6th rounder - and yet, who doesn't regard Brady as one of the top QBs in the league today? I could go on...but b'cse someone gets dropped low on the list of being picked, doesn't mean their draft value is lower. There could be a host of reasons - like he doesn't fit another teams style of defense, or that the needs of the teams varied to another area such that he could not be picked at that point in time, etc. There are many variables and many players to evaluate and pick from. It's by no means as simple as: you didn't get picked therefore, you're really not that good as the previous mock drafts had you...
                      I never said good talent couldn't be had in the lower rounds. What I said is you can't base a players value off of a mock draft.

                      Just because some amatures had him rated that high. If Youboty was one of the top ranked CB's in the eyes of the professionals then he would've been drafted like that and not had 9 CB's drafted ahead of him.

                      I never said Youboty sucked or that he wasn't a good deal in the 3rd. He just wasn't a steal "because he should've been a first round pick" like some people are saying just because some mock drafts had him listed as one. Some have even said we had 3 first round picks because of Youboty.

                      Comment

                      • BillsFever21
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 9067

                        #12
                        Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                        With Whitner and McCargo everyone said that the amatures opinion didn't mean anything.

                        When the amatures have a player we took rated high they are correct and you can take their word for it.

                        Comment

                        • Bling
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 13022

                          #13
                          Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                          Amazing how you can spin Whitner and McCargo being good picks in one thread, then when the draft board says they were both negatives but the Bills overall won, the Bills had a great draft and everyone forgets Whitner and McCargo are not good value picks. Which is it? The draft chart or Marv? Marv or the draft chart?

                          Comment

                          • mysticsoto
                            Too sober for this...
                            • Apr 2004
                            • 31439

                            #14
                            Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                            Originally posted by BillsFever21
                            I never said good talent couldn't be had in the lower rounds. What I said is you can't base a players value off of a mock draft.

                            Just because some amatures had him rated that high. If Youboty was one of the top ranked CB's in the eyes of the professionals then he would've been drafted like that and not had 9 CB's drafted ahead of him.

                            I never said Youboty sucked or that he wasn't a good deal in the 3rd. He just wasn't a steal "because he should've been a first round pick" like some people are saying just because some mock drafts had him listed as one. Some have even said we had 3 first round picks because of Youboty.
                            Define "Amateur"...the mock drafts that most of us have been using are from professional analysts. Mel Kiper's sole job is to rate the talent out there. I'm sure he employs many of the same things that scouts for individual teams do. He's also at the combine and pro days...are you calling him and those like him an amateur ??? I call amateurs, people like you and I, people of the zone, etc...

                            Comment

                            • jamze132
                              Don’t hate…
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 29312

                              #15
                              Re: Calculated Draft value for 2006

                              I like your research! But you could have said it in a few less words, for instance, you could have said, : Mel Kiper licks donkeyballs"!


                              Nice work!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X