Donte Whitner addressed the question of whether the Bills "reached" by picking him at # 8 in his first press conference by saying that he was not because Baltimore had told him that, if he was still on the board, they were going to take him at # 13. He also mentioned that he had talked with St. Louis about them taking him at # 11. He said that since he would have been gone within the next six picks, he did not feel that Buffalo "reached" by picking him at # 8.
This basically confirms what B.Billick said about the Ravens taking Whitner. Since all of the trade offers/discussions the Bills had were from teams picking after the Ravens, this means that the Bills would have, indeed, lost out on Whitner if they traded down out of the # 8 spot with any of those teams with the intention of taking him later. Whitner's mention of St.Louis as being one of the teams that had indicated that they were interested in drafting him also adds to the likelihood that Whitner would have been gone shortly after the # 8 pick if the Bills did not take him there as well, regardless of what Detroit may have done.
While there is no way of saying whether the Bills were more interested in Huff than Whitner (there have been reports that Whitner was their man all along, but who knows?), I hope this puts to rest the notion that he was that much of a "reach" or that the Bills could have accepted the trade down offers that they had and been certain that they would have gotten Whitner anyway or that the Bills panicked and grabbed Whitner without there being a realistic possibility that he would have been drafted within the next few picks in the draft.
If no one is calling the Cowboys' selection of Bobby Carpenter at # 18 (before the NY Giants probably would have taken him at # 25) a "reach", then no one should call the Bills' pick of Whitner at # 8 (before the Ravens would have taken him at # 13 or the Rams might have at # 11) a "reach" either. The Bills got the man that they wanted within six picks of when he would have been selected by another team, while the Cowboys got their man within seven picks of when he would have been taken by another team--so which team "reached" more?
This basically confirms what B.Billick said about the Ravens taking Whitner. Since all of the trade offers/discussions the Bills had were from teams picking after the Ravens, this means that the Bills would have, indeed, lost out on Whitner if they traded down out of the # 8 spot with any of those teams with the intention of taking him later. Whitner's mention of St.Louis as being one of the teams that had indicated that they were interested in drafting him also adds to the likelihood that Whitner would have been gone shortly after the # 8 pick if the Bills did not take him there as well, regardless of what Detroit may have done.
While there is no way of saying whether the Bills were more interested in Huff than Whitner (there have been reports that Whitner was their man all along, but who knows?), I hope this puts to rest the notion that he was that much of a "reach" or that the Bills could have accepted the trade down offers that they had and been certain that they would have gotten Whitner anyway or that the Bills panicked and grabbed Whitner without there being a realistic possibility that he would have been drafted within the next few picks in the draft.
If no one is calling the Cowboys' selection of Bobby Carpenter at # 18 (before the NY Giants probably would have taken him at # 25) a "reach", then no one should call the Bills' pick of Whitner at # 8 (before the Ravens would have taken him at # 13 or the Rams might have at # 11) a "reach" either. The Bills got the man that they wanted within six picks of when he would have been selected by another team, while the Cowboys got their man within seven picks of when he would have been taken by another team--so which team "reached" more?
Comment