I'm sure that if anyone on the prosecutor's team had said "Hey guys, you realize what we're doing here is tacitly admitting that the plane was shot
I think you're doubling down on your idiocy to hide the fact you'd rather argue with me than have a discussion.
Your impressions and rationalizations
No they should have not shot the gorilla. They should have tranqulized it. If the tranqulizer didn't take effect fast enough and the gorilla became aggressive
Huh? Who is "they" who"didn't dignify the driver's statement with a response"?
What "doesn't work that way"?