The interesting thing I took away from it is it begs the question is Roberts being consistent in his rational, or not? He alludes to the court's responsibility
The greatest rendition of the Star Spangled banner ever.
Is that the best you can come up with...a false charge of "anger"???
What a terrible op-ed piece. The title is ignored in the text. I expected an explanation of why Roberts decided the way he did and the juxtaposition
Losing Darius is huge.