1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid
Printable View
1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid
This means WR day 1. I like it, we will be better with Sweed or Kelly in there.
I've wanted Hackett ALL ALONG, before FA.
F'n sign him, they NEED an improvement besides a rookie. I cant fathom they wouldnt sign ANY of these #2 WR's.
Thank God that saga is over.
Because they are #3s and/or injury prone?Quote:
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
It would be nice, but they are not great upgrades.
Hackett would be a HUGE upgrade if healthy, and considering our offense blows balls, it would be nice to take a chance or two.
Yes, our defense has gotten better.. Now its time to do something, ANYTHING to help the offense, besides just counting on rookies.
**** Johnson.. I've wanted Hackett since before FA started; this kid can play.
Why would they look at Johnson and not look at Hackett?
link?
Because Hackett, much like our offense blows balls.Quote:
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
Enjoy playing with the old legs Issac Bruce and the flop Ashley Lelie. That team now has 3 #2s and no #1.
does this mean all the BJ threads are done? :sadwalk:
I would not say Hackett blows balls, but his injury past makes it a risk.
Would I like him here? Sure. But it is not a crisis if he is not brought in.
What would bother me more is if they do not sign a CB, because then there is a problem at #11 as to what position to take. They need to sign James now so CB is not as much of glaring need.
Pat, as of right now I see nothing on any main site saying this... without a link, I think this should be moved to Spam and titled "rumor"Quote:
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
I'll take Hackett for league minimum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
rumor?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Miyagi
If/when a link shows up, I will remove the word rumor. There has been too many of these.
I will leave it here, since Pat is not the type to make **** up.
I'm looking and haven't seen ****. Only link I have seen is from the same site that had us already signing him
I was guilty of floating a few myself. I think the standard should be that we add rumor to the title until we have a link. However, even then we have to consider the source too as far as the link goes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
That said, I have a feeling we find out where Johnson is going today.Quote:
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
Both Hackett and James would be good to sign and shouldn't blow the bank. That would give us options and free us up with our picks!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
GR8, Hackett does not blow! He's actually pretty good if he can stay healthy. But even if he only lasts half a season with us, that's half a season that a rookie can use to get acclimated and develop before he is thrown in...Like Pat, I don't understand why the FO is not even bringing him in to check him out. I do hear that there is concern about his work ethic - so maybe that's why.
let's bring back robert royal. we need a big body that can go over the middle...