Why?
We have one of the best young WR threats in Sammy Watkins, a rock solid WR in Robert Woods, a playmaking downfield threat in Percy Harvin, and you signed a receiving TE threat to a monster contract in Charles Clay...
Yet we're starting a QB who doesn't throw downfield and hasn't thrown a TD in the NFL ever?
Dink and dunk won't win games. Points do. Run heavy? sure. But defenses simply stack the box.
If you want a legit playoff contender you have to be able to score through the air as well. I don't need Tyrod to be a stud passer. But he has to show he can at least throw to our WR weapons in the intermediate to long routes and throw TD's in the red zone.
This move potentially makes our offense one dimensional, limited in the pass game, and possibly easier to defend against.
I hope to hell he throws well and averages 2 TD's a game. I'm rooting for him but this move seems risky to me.
We have one of the best young WR threats in Sammy Watkins, a rock solid WR in Robert Woods, a playmaking downfield threat in Percy Harvin, and you signed a receiving TE threat to a monster contract in Charles Clay...
Yet we're starting a QB who doesn't throw downfield and hasn't thrown a TD in the NFL ever?
Dink and dunk won't win games. Points do. Run heavy? sure. But defenses simply stack the box.
If you want a legit playoff contender you have to be able to score through the air as well. I don't need Tyrod to be a stud passer. But he has to show he can at least throw to our WR weapons in the intermediate to long routes and throw TD's in the red zone.
This move potentially makes our offense one dimensional, limited in the pass game, and possibly easier to defend against.
I hope to hell he throws well and averages 2 TD's a game. I'm rooting for him but this move seems risky to me.
Comment