Micheal Vick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Typ0
    honey pie
    • Jul 2002
    • 32592

    Micheal Vick

    I just put it in the Cutler thread and think it deserves it's own. Oh my Fing God everyone is bantering on and on about Cutler when Vick is the perfect fit for this team!
  • Forward_Lateral
    Registered User
    • Mar 2004
    • 29895

    #2
    Re: Micheal Vick

    Another crackhead.

    Comment

    • Novacane
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 42348

      #3
      Re: Micheal Vick

      He's washed up.

      Comment

      • Typ0
        honey pie
        • Jul 2002
        • 32592

        #4
        Re: Micheal Vick

        He's older Novacane. Certainly not the player he was in his youth....all he needs is to understand that though. I'm not saying he's going to come in here and be the Vick of old but we need a guy with talent and smarts that can win football games...and when Vick is on a competitive squad he's a winner.

        Comment

        • Typ0
          honey pie
          • Jul 2002
          • 32592

          #5
          Re: Micheal Vick

          I will say one thing though ... he should have been our QB last year and this year as well while Manual was maturing not kevin frigging Kolb. So what if the NFL wanted him somewhere else. You still apply pressure and make the aggressive play. I feel this team is too damn good to be floundering around for talent at the QB spot. This is a team that can compete with any other at any time with better coaching and better quarterbacking. Hell marrone is a great coach if someone else manages the game!

          Comment

          • Novacane
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 42348

            #6
            Re: Micheal Vick

            I wouldn't be against bringing him in cheap to compete. I don't want them putting all their eggs in a Vick basket though.

            Comment

            • Joe Fo Sho
              Making Spirits Bright
              • Mar 2006
              • 6194

              #7
              Re: Micheal Vick

              Originally posted by Typ0 View Post
              He's older Novacane. Certainly not the player he was in his youth....all he needs is to understand that though. I'm not saying he's going to come in here and be the Vick of old but we need a guy with talent and smarts that can win football games...and when Vick is on a competitive squad he's a winner.
              Until he breaks his leg Week 6.

              I was the biggest supporter of Vick to the Bills after he was coming out of jail before signing with Philly. He's too old now, I'd rather stick with Orton and see if EJ can get better.

              Comment

              • BuffaloRedleg
                Registered User
                • Aug 2013
                • 1270

                #8
                Re: Micheal Vick

                I can't get on board with this one. He is not better than Orton, and arguably about as good as Manuel.

                It's nice to be able to run but not being able to pass from the pocket at all makes you useless.

                Comment

                • Typ0
                  honey pie
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 32592

                  #9
                  Re: Micheal Vick

                  Originally posted by Novacane View Post
                  I wouldn't be against bringing him in cheap to compete. I don't want them putting all their eggs in a Vick basket though.
                  I agree with that whole-heatedly!!! It's all about the mixture you achieve not the individual ingredients. Why put our eggs in any one QBs basket for that matter?

                  Comment

                  • Jaybird
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 1908

                    #10
                    Re: Micheal Vick

                    worth a try.. need to bring in as many Qbs as possible, till something works.. like Seattle did a few years back

                    Comment

                    • Forward_Lateral
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 29895

                      #11
                      Re: Micheal Vick

                      He can't beat out Geno Smith. Enough said.

                      Comment

                      • Typ0
                        honey pie
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 32592

                        #12
                        Re: Micheal Vick

                        Originally posted by BuffaloRedleg View Post
                        I can't get on board with this one. He is not better than Orton, and arguably about as good as Manuel.

                        It's nice to be able to run but not being able to pass from the pocket at all makes you useless.
                        RedLeg Vick is a perfect fit for this team right now. We have all kinds of skilled guys that need the ball. He's just another threat. We have a pocket passer who doesn't have time to get comfortable and do what he does. It's about what fits best not what any one player is. The other thing is the intangible that Vick brings. The guy wins ....

                        Comment

                        • Typ0
                          honey pie
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 32592

                          #13
                          Re: Micheal Vick

                          Originally posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
                          He can't beat out Geno Smith. Enough said.
                          because the team is horrible and they want Smith to play.

                          - - - Updated - - -

                          I really think the bottom line is Vick is such a better option than Cutler. Why do so many jump on the Cutler band wagon and Vick is not even mentioned?

                          Comment

                          • Joe Fo Sho
                            Making Spirits Bright
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 6194

                            #14
                            Re: Micheal Vick

                            Originally posted by Typ0 View Post
                            I agree with that whole-heatedly!!! It's all about the mixture you achieve not the individual ingredients. Why put our eggs in any one QBs basket for that matter?
                            Just because you mix different types of **** in a pot doesn't mean you come out with a decent stew. Unless you want to have a QB by committee, you have to pick one of these guys. I don't see how having them compete makes either of them better.

                            I've always liked the excitement Vick used to bring when he was on the field, but I didn't see any of that this year on the Jets.

                            Comment

                            • Typ0
                              honey pie
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 32592

                              #15
                              Re: Micheal Vick

                              the jets suck though ... we are a pretty damn good team without a quarterback.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X