In your opinion, at this point from what you've read and seen, does it really matter who starts at QB (JP, KH or Nall)?
In your opinion, at this point from what you've read and seen, does it really matter who starts at QB (JP, KH or Nall)?
I'm all for starting JP but anxious to see what Nall can do.
I'll see who does best in the preseason against real opposition before I blindly name and follow a starter.
The guy who does the best wins ythe job. If they both excell, go with JP- If they Both suck, go with the guy who will win you the most games.
I voted for JP, but if Nall's the answer, that's fine too. Anybody But Holcomb.
"It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
We should be able to tell more probably after the 2nd preseason game. Nall will be back hopefully competing for 2nd string.
The only knock on Nall is the fact that Green Bay draft Aaron Rogers when they already had Nall. IF Nall was worthy or replacing Favre he'd still be there.
JP is the answer for now, growing pains will happen. He's only started 8 games.
Send me some wings!
I voted they all suck. Which is true.
For the love of GOD, please get the pre-season going before the moronic QB talk gets any worse !
Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
Screwed??? I think its more like raped.
Which is still JP. Again its a joke all QB competitions are. But then again I don't expect the Bills staff to have the guts the Bengals, NYG etc have to just let JP start and be done with itOriginally Posted by Dozerdog
That's no knock on Nall. That's football. A new GM picks a QB who until a few days before the draft was supposed to be the no. 1 pick and falls to 24th. Green Bay wasn't planning on taking a QB. All the talk was about Nall being first in line to replace Favre. Stuff like that happens. I guess Losman is really nothing. His GM signed a FA Quarterback who has never been more than 2nd string. What does that say about Losman?Originally Posted by MTBillsFan
If Nall wasn't a career backup, he'd still be in Green Bay.
The training camp practices I was at, he was the worst of the three.
IMO you start JP no matter what. But from what I'm reading I don't think it matters. We're likely to have a very poor year at QB.
NOTE: THIS IS MY OPINION. THIS IS NOT A REPORT.
That is dumb.Originally Posted by Risin
Most likely GB doesnt even know what they had in Nall. Its so hard to tell with QB's.
Look at the NFC championship game. Look at their QB's paths.
Originally Posted by theanswer74
Your fellating of Nall is dumb.
You've hitched your wagon to the guy, so if he pans out you're perceived as a genius.
I've seen the man in camp, and he was BRUTAL!!
Couldn't make the short throws, or the long throws, and didn't have the rocket arm as advertised.
I don't want to hear that he needs experience either, dude started learning the offense around the sametime JP and Kelly did.
All you are is a fan who thinks he's smarter then he really is.
Come back and join those of us who aren't pretending to know more then we really do.
If I'm wrong about Nall, I'll apologize. I can only go by what I've seen, and he has stunk.
Originally Posted by theanswer74
I seem to recall that Warner started the year and then Manning took over. And Palmer sat on the bench for a year and watched Kitna play. My FACTS could be wrong though.Originally Posted by ICE74129
Mr C., I think I asked this question recently, remember?
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/new...te=1&p=1587729
Let's also find out with all things equal, who your grandmother would like to start and then narrow it down to ten year age brackets/ 70-80 years old only for granny.
hopefully mr peppers solves our qb decision and breaks homobums neck on saturday
Originally Posted by djjimkelly
violent but effective.
The only thing that either of the three QBs need to do is to assist the running game by ensuring completions in the passing game. Keep the defense of the field and uphold an accuracy rating much higher than others have accomplished for the team in recent years.
Honestly, I don't expect see superstars from any of the choices. I just want to see better production that helps win football games.