View Poll Results: Should the Bills have placed Troy Vincent on the IR

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 56.52%
  • No

    5 21.74%
  • Whatever

    5 21.74%
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

  1. #1
    Drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls Bill Brasky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    66,218
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    153

    Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Judging from what I've heard I don't know if it was such a good idea.

    Yes, he is aging.

    Yes, he's not as good as he once was.

    But it didn't seem like it was something that would take more than a few weeks to recover from.

    With the injury to Bowen I can understand, but at the same time I don't know if it was such a good decision. They basically send the message to TV that he is done in BUF.

    -------------

    Vincent said tests showed the hamstring was not torn. He believed he would be out for only a few weeks and was surprised to learn of the team's decision to place him on IR.

    Spikes said he intends to play Sunday. More significant to him was the news of Vincent being placed on IR.

    "I'm disappointed about it," Spikes said. "You can't replace experience, point-blank, period."

  2. #2
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Why not?

    I think it's a good idea to start getting Simpson out there so we can start seeing both our safeties learning to crawl, walk, and maybe even run full speed this year.

    that doesn't necessarily mean simpson is a lock to take the position, but I hope Jauron decides to go that route instead of bringing back Jim Leonhard (who I'm not knocking, the guy's got a lot of heart, and that can go a long way, but Simpson has the potential to be a star in this league).
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

  3. #3
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    For the record, I voted "Whatever".

  4. #4
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    I don't think so. Sure, Simpson has more physical ability to do the job at FS, but he doesn't yet have the smarts to do all that is required at the position. Simpson would still get playing time on defense in some packages and it's not like Vincent wasn't already working with him...so he'd still develop. Right now, Vincent has an edge at FS, IMO.
    Also, how much film work would Vincent be doing now that he's on IR? Whitner and Simpson were learning the ropes about what to look for in film sessions with Vincent. I think it may have set back their learning.

  5. #5
    Maybe? Mr. Cynical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,766
    Thanks
    1,182
    Thanked 486 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Vincent =

    Time to move on. This team is not a contender so it is important to start taking steps to become one. Vincent can help the team the best by being a mentor to Simpson from the sidelines and in practice.

  6. #6
    Roways rooking ahread! Mitchy moo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    In a tight spot
    Posts
    18,380
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Cynical
    Vincent =

    Time to move on. This team is not a contender so it is important to start taking steps to become one. Vincent can help the team the best by being a mentor to Simpson from the sidelines and in practice.
    that's terrible but funny.

  7. #7
    Zero for Zero! Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    67,923
    Thanks
    14,087
    Thanked 17,693 Times in 8,476 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    286

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    I would have rather seen a guy like Merz waived and re-signed to the Practice Squad.

    Since he is still being paid and counts against the cap, I would rather see Troy on the roster even in a reserve role.
    Quote Originally Posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.

  8. #8
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    I would have rather seen a guy like Merz waived and re-signed to the Practice Squad.

    Since he is still being paid and counts against the cap, I would rather see Troy on the roster even in a reserve role.
    at least as a reserve, he'd still be approaching game film study like a starter would...and Simpson and Whitner would still be learning from him..

  9. #9
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Good news is, he just said he still intends to work with Simpson and Whitner...total class act

  10. #10
    Banned G. Host's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    10,298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Vincent has been out of gas for a while and Bowen appeared to be his replacement until Simposon was ready and Vincent was kept for leadership. Bowen got injured and they can not afford to keep him for leadership.
    Jerry Sullivan was wrong as usual - Vincent was not just old, he was old, losing abilities and over priced.

  11. #11
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    101,229
    Thanks
    16,150
    Thanked 26,407 Times in 13,792 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    285

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Cynical
    Vincent =

    Time to move on. This team is not a contender so it is important to start taking steps to become one. Vincent can help the team the best by being a mentor to Simpson from the sidelines and in practice.
    I agree, but why would he do this now that there's a good chance he'll never take the field in a Bills uni again?

  12. #12
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157

    Re: Should the Bills have placed Vincent on IR?

    Quote Originally Posted by G. Host
    Vincent has been out of gas for a while and Bowen appeared to be his replacement until Simposon was ready and Vincent was kept for leadership. Bowen got injured and they can not afford to keep him for leadership.
    Jerry Sullivan was wrong as usual - Vincent was not just old, he was old, losing abilities and over priced.
    I'm pretty sure Bowen practiced exclusively at SS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •