Tweet
this team just reminds me so much of the 1986 team...a step forward, two back...a step forward, three back, a step forward...it needs a lot of work. I didn't expect that much coming into the season but they have regressed...they need to take the bye week and start over come back against GB like it was game 1.
-
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding. -
Re: It's 1986 all over again....
Your right, it is 1986 all over again.
and we may have the next Reed (Evans) on this roster, but that's about it.. THere sure as hell aint no Jim Kellys, and I dont see any Thurms, Hulls, Bruce's, Biscuits (well maybe Crowell), Talleys or even Odomes (at this point) on this team. -
Re: It's 1986 all over again....
I don't see Jim Kelly nor any other HOF type players hanging out on our roster though.Originally posted by EbenezerComment
-
Re: It's 1986 all over again....
reread the 1986 roster...all we had was JK, AR and BS...Evans might compare, someday.Originally posted by ICE74129
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.Comment
-
Re: It's 1986 all over again....
WEll I"m not sure what your implying.. But if take away Jim Kelly and insert Joe Dufek, then I'll buy into comparing this team to the 1986 team.Comment
-
Re: It's 1986 all over again....
All we had? All we had was 3 HOF calibre guys!Originally posted by EbenezerComment
Comment