If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
First vote of the '07 offseason - Shall we expand?
Re: First vote of the '07 offseason - Shall we expand?
Originally posted by madness
I agree. Eb was right about most of us practically having all-star teams. It's time to dilute the talent pool.
Maybe the rest of you have a talented team. That's cause a few of us don't. I didn't draft this team originally, but I will slowly get it talented. As long as I have drafts like last year.
Re: First vote of the '07 offseason - Shall we expand?
Eb, I should clarifiy, I voted no, but if you can find 6 people who will be active, then I'd change my vote to yes. (2 to replace current owners, and 4 for the new teams). I see no point in expanding if all the teams aren't going to be active.
Re: First vote of the '07 offseason - Shall we expand?
Originally posted by Forward_Lateral
Eb, I should clarifiy, I voted no, but if you can find 6 people who will be active, then I'd change my vote to yes. (2 to replace current owners, and 4 for the new teams). I see no point in expanding if all the teams aren't going to be active.
My thoughts exactly. It's hard to keep 20 active owners right now. It would suck to expand 4 more teams and a bunch of us have to give up good players we want just for them 4 teams to bail out after 1 year. Then we're stuck trying to find 4 more owners to take over the teams. Then if all of them don't stay it's a battle you can't win.
Tweet
Comment