Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,216
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 972 Times in 578 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    With Walker now in the fold the Bills top 4 DTs are pretty much locked in place. What concerns me is that there is not a 300lber in the bunch. This would be o.k. if the Bills had a T. Harris/W. Sapp type of player, but that does not appear to be the case (unless McCargo develops quickly). I will admit that I wanted the Hawks to get Okoye because he has the potential to be a Tommie Harris/Warren Sapp.

    The history of the Cover 2 is that it is an effective defense when you have (1) a premier DT (i.e., Sapp/Harris) and (2) a linebacker with safety speed (i.e., Urlacher/Brooks) OR an unstopable offense (i.e., Indy).

    I hope Marv and co. know what they are doing. The draft will be critical to rebuild what is now a gutted linebacker corps.

  2. #2
    Legendary Zoner Earthquake Enyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    On the Boilermaker Special
    Posts
    27,521
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    They want faster gap shooter types, not fat run pluggers.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,216
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 972 Times in 578 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Earthquake Enyart
    They want faster gap shooter types, not fat run pluggers.
    I know that is what they say they want, but my concern is that such a scheme doesn't work without a truly great DT in the middle.

  4. #4
    Legendary Zoner Earthquake Enyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    On the Boilermaker Special
    Posts
    27,521
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Everyone has one gap.

    The problem will be the LB's, not the DL.

  5. #5
    Registered User don137's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hilton Head
    Posts
    7,720
    Thanks
    317
    Thanked 485 Times in 254 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    I would say DT is a big question mark position. They have the talent to be effective but that is rolling the dice. Triplett got better as the year went on, Walker can be a great player if he can stay motivated and McCargo and Williams were rookies last year that should take big steps forward. If all that happens the Bills should be solid at DT.
    If McCargo and Williams don't improve, Triplett plays like he did early in the year and Walker stays inconsistent then the DT will be a big weakness for the team.

  6. #6
    Legendary Zoner Earthquake Enyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    On the Boilermaker Special
    Posts
    27,521
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    I think Williams was very good last year. He was the steal of the draft.

  7. #7
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    McCargo becomes the key.

    he HAS to become a good 1 gap NT


    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,216
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 972 Times in 578 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    So does Walker start at the nose or does he split time with Triplett?

  9. #9
    Registered User TedMock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,221
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 169 Times in 106 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by patmoran2006
    McCargo becomes the key.

    he HAS to become a good 1 gap NT
    That's what he is. I'm more concerned with not having a true 2-gapper. I understand the defense and how it's designed. However, in certain situations and schemes, you need a quality 2-gap DT to take blockers away from the 1-gap. How much more effective could Tripplett have been had he not been double teamed? Fighting off double teams is part of the game, but guys like Tim Anderson weren't even requiring a chip let alone a double team.

    Having said that, I think Walker is a good pickup at good price. He's a quality DT who will produce for us. I watched McCargo play in college and he's also a quality DT (well, at least he was in college). I think the overall rotation is a good one now. You just can't run the same defense every play.

  10. #10
    Registered User Saratoga Slim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,151
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 1,193 Times in 627 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by TedMock
    That's what he is. I'm more concerned with not having a true 2-gapper. I understand the defense and how it's designed. However, in certain situations and schemes, you need a quality 2-gap DT to take blockers away from the 1-gap. How much more effective could Tripplett have been had he not been double teamed? Fighting off double teams is part of the game, but guys like Tim Anderson weren't even requiring a chip let alone a double team.
    I think you and Pat are talking about the same position.
    Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

  11. #11
    Registered User acehole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    His moms house
    Posts
    4,876
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 86 Times in 58 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    yes

    Quote Originally Posted by EDS
    With Walker now in the fold the Bills top 4 DTs are pretty much locked in place. What concerns me is that there is not a 300lber in the bunch. This would be o.k. if the Bills had a T. Harris/W. Sapp type of player, but that does not appear to be the case (unless McCargo develops quickly). I will admit that I wanted the Hawks to get Okoye because he has the potential to be a Tommie Harris/Warren Sapp.

    The history of the Cover 2 is that it is an effective defense when you have (1) a premier DT (i.e., Sapp/Harris) and (2) a linebacker with safety speed (i.e., Urlacher/Brooks) OR an unstopable offense (i.e., Indy).

    I hope Marv and co. know what they are doing. The draft will be critical to rebuild what is now a gutted linebacker corps.

  12. #12
    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres. Jan Reimers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jupiter
    Posts
    17,353
    Thanks
    1,910
    Thanked 1,626 Times in 705 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    139

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Less than yesterday, but I do think we could use a Ted Washington/Pat Williams/Sam Adams type to stuff the run.
    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

  13. #13
    Retired - On Several Levels Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    33,117
    Thanks
    9,387
    Thanked 14,240 Times in 7,618 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    126

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    With 5 picks through Round 4, I could see another DT.

    You make a valid point.
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

  14. #14
    Everything I post is sexual inuendo ddaryl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The North Left Coast
    Posts
    10,714
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    51

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Night Train
    With 5 picks through Round 4, I could see another DT.

    You make a valid point.
    It's possible but then who gets cut.

    We are already sporting a full rotation of DT's. If we draft a DT someone is getting cut.

    Honestly I don't see the Bill staking a DT this year, they drafted McCargo and Williams last year, and traded for Walker this year. There will be no DT's on draft day IMO, but if they did Jefferson is the odd duck

    99Jefferson, JasonDT6-1295252Wisconsin
    97McCargo, JohnDT6-229523RN.C. State
    98Tripplett, LarryDT6-2295285Washington
    --Walker, DarwinDT6-3294299Tennessee
    95Williams, KyleDT6-129523RLSU


  15. #15
    H to the 12:20 Jeff1220's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    6,135
    Thanks
    2,276
    Thanked 593 Times in 304 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    38

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Stopping the run in this system is not about "stuffing the hole" but more about penetration. If these DTs can make it into the backfield, they will be able to dispupt and blow up plays - both run and pass.

  16. #16
    WORK HARD. PLAY HARD. LIVE HARD. BuffaloRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,246
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Didn't the Bills prove beyond a shadow of a doubt last year the folly of the "Small, fast, DTs theory". They couldn't stop the run up the gut all year long. Period.

    Seriously. It doesn't work. They will be tore up through the middle once again.

    And you basically have Tripplet and Walker playing the same postion. WTF is that? Paying two salaries for one DT? I understand the rotation philosophy, but then you always have one of them on the bench. Seems like overkill.
    Buffalo Only and Always.

  17. #17
    The Plagiarist The Answer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The depths of the human mind
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Question Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by EDS
    With Walker now in the fold the Bills top 4 DTs are pretty much locked in place. What concerns me is that there is not a 300lber in the bunch. This would be o.k. if the Bills had a T. Harris/W. Sapp type of player, but that does not appear to be the case (unless McCargo develops quickly). I will admit that I wanted the Hawks to get Okoye because he has the potential to be a Tommie Harris/Warren Sapp.

    The history of the Cover 2 is that it is an effective defense when you have (1) a premier DT (i.e., Sapp/Harris) and (2) a linebacker with safety speed (i.e., Urlacher/Brooks) OR an unstopable offense (i.e., Indy).

    I hope Marv and co. know what they are doing. The draft will be critical to rebuild what is now a gutted linebacker corps.
    The Answer is very concerned. We have a great group of pass rushing DT's, but no beasts that are true run stoppers.

    Also what does acquiring Walker mean for McCargo? Have they conceded to bust status already?

    ~The Answer

  18. #18
    Registered User gr8slayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Frisco, TX
    Posts
    20,796
    Thanks
    147
    Thanked 580 Times in 326 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    78

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    I haven't been concerned about it, I think were perfectly fine and have some great depth now for a rotation system. I would be very PO'd if we still drafted a DT in the first round.

  19. #19
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    For better or worse; their DT's are set. They have four rotational guys... I refuse to even count Timmay Tim Anderson

  20. #20
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    101,124
    Thanks
    16,098
    Thanked 26,364 Times in 13,764 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    285

    Re: Anyone else still concerned over DT?

    Quote Originally Posted by gr8slayer
    I haven't been concerned about it, I think were perfectly fine and have some great depth now for a rotation system. I would be very PO'd if we still drafted a DT in the first round.
    the rotation is fine but we're rotating a bunch of guys who can't stop the run. I really do not think the "shoot the gap with small DT's" scheme works. At the very least it puts us in a SEVERE disadvantage in short yardage situations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •