If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.
chart value wise, it isn't.
The funny thing about this year's LB's though is that for a cover two defense, there are better LB for that fit in the 3rd round than second.
Guys like Rufus Alexander, Buster Davis and Earl Everett are 3rd round projections by most.
The funny thing about this year's LB's though is that for a cover two defense, there are better LB for that fit in the 3rd round than second.
Guys like Rufus Alexander, Buster Davis and Earl Everett are 3rd round projections by most.
true true, i guess there really arent that many guys that are projected to go in the 2nd that i would want, and strangely the guys you mentioned that are projected to go in the 3rd i would like to have. plus, we would have 2 picks in the 3rd, so we could get WR or CB.
Comment