http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7...40813162&ATT=5
I think Whitlock has a lot of great points in there.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7...40813162&ATT=5
I think Whitlock has a lot of great points in there.
You think you're hot **** in a champagne glass, but you're really cold diarrhea in a Dixie cup!
I really like Whitlock's columns a lot.
"'Clean up your room.', 'Stand up straight.', 'Pick up your feet.', 'Take it like a man.', 'Be nice to your sister.', 'Don't mix beer and wine, ever.'. Oh yeah, 'Don't drive on the railroad track.'"
"Eh, Phil. That's one I happen to agree with."
"Plus, you risk having every hip hop entertainer hooking up with their favorite hip hop football player and throwing a party, which will invite every hip hop wannabe gangsta to descend on the host city and loiter. "
I loved that blurb!
He makes some good points, but this isn't one of them:
Umm... if the coach is obligated to score as many points as possible, why was Brady out of the game? Unfortunately simple logic is not everyone's strength. Fact is that the Pats were running up the score. Doesn't bother me though. They were trying to make up for the losses to the Fins over the last few years, including 21-0 last season. Good for them. Hopefully the Fins are pissed off enough to do something about it.A coach is obligated to score as many points as he possibly can. Heck, yes, the Patriots should've been in their two-minute offense and trying to score just before halftime. And Belichick had every right to re-insert Tom Brady into the game after Jason Taylor's pick-6 cut the lead to 21 points in the fourth quarter.
Brady came back in because his replacement threw and int for a TD.Originally Posted by FinFaninBuffalo
You can't score enough points. Comebacks happen.
You missed my point. The author's logic was flawed. If the goal is to REALLY score as many points as possible, Brady would not have been taken out of the game.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote