Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

[patmoran2006]

1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid

[PECKERWOOD]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

This means WR day 1. I like it, we will be better with Sweed or Kelly in there.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

I've wanted Hackett ALL ALONG, before FA.

F'n sign him, they NEED an improvement besides a rookie. I cant fathom they wouldnt sign ANY of these #2 WR's.

[Night Train]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

Thank God that saga is over.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

I've wanted Hackett ALL ALONG, before FA.

F'n sign him, they NEED an improvement besides a rookie. I cant fathom they wouldnt sign ANY of these #2 WR's.

Because they are #3s and/or injury prone?

It would be nice, but they are not great upgrades.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

Hackett would be a HUGE upgrade if healthy, and considering our offense blows balls, it would be nice to take a chance or two.

Yes, our defense has gotten better.. Now its time to do something, ANYTHING to help the offense, besides just counting on rookies.

**** Johnson.. I've wanted Hackett since before FA started; this kid can play.

Why would they look at Johnson and not look at Hackett?

[ScottLawrence]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

link?

[gr8slayer]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

Hackett would be a HUGE upgrade if healthy, and considering our offense blows balls, it would be nice to take a chance or two.

Yes, our defense has gotten better.. Now its time to do something, ANYTHING to help the offense, besides just counting on rookies.

**** Johnson.. I've wanted Hackett since before FA started; this kid can play.

Why would they look at Johnson and not look at Hackett?

Because Hackett, much like our offense blows balls.

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid

Enjoy playing with the old legs Issac Bruce and the flop Ashley Lelie. That team now has 3 #2s and no #1.

[Bill Brasky]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

does this mean all the BJ threads are done?

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

I would not say Hackett blows balls, but his injury past makes it a risk.
Would I like him here? Sure. But it is not a crisis if he is not brought in.

What would bother me more is if they do not sign a CB, because then there is a problem at #11 as to what position to take. They need to sign James now so CB is not as much of glaring need.

[X-Era]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid

Pat, as of right now I see nothing on any main site saying this... without a link, I think this should be moved to Spam and titled "rumor"

[gr8slayer]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

I would not say Hackett blows balls, but his injury past makes it a risk.
Would I like him here? Sure. But it is not a crisis if he is not brought in.

What would bother me more is if they do not sign a CB, because then there is a problem at #11 as to what position to take. They need to sign James now so CB is not as much of glaring need.

I'll take Hackett for league minimum.

[X-Era]

Re: Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

Enjoy playing with the old legs Issac Bruce and the flop Ashley Lelie. That team now has 3 #2s and no #1.

rumor?

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: RUMOR - Bryant Johnson signs.. With SF

If/when a link shows up, I will remove the word rumor. There has been too many of these.

I will leave it here, since Pat is not the type to make **** up.