Kelly vs. Sweed

[justasportsfan]

Kelly

http://youtube.com/watch?v=T9W7nTi4JFQ

Sweed

http://youtube.com/watch?v=4AHAhZsrEL4

Disscuss?

[gr8slayer]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

Having watched both for a couple of years I can tell you that Sweed is by far the better run blocker and much more physical,

[justasportsfan]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

Having watched both for a couple of years I can tell you that Sweed is by far the better run blocker.

Evans doesn't need that.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed



What good is drafting an WR when TE has a rag arm and won't be able to get him the ball?

[justasportsfan]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

What good is drafting an WR when TE has a rag arm and won't be able to get him the ball?

says who?

[blackonyx89]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

Kelly

http://youtube.com/watch?v=T9W7nTi4JFQ

Sweed

http://youtube.com/watch?v=4AHAhZsrEL4

Disscuss?

I'd go with Sweed. Moneywise, he's going to be cheaper and as far as
his skills, he's got great speed and I like his unorthodox receiving skills,
especially when it comes to adjusting the ball when thrown awkwardly or
underthrown. BTW, Trent doesn't have a "rag arm" and he's gonna
have to learn to play in nasty cold weather.

[Mitchy moo]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

What good is drafting an WR when TE has a rag arm and won't be able to get him the ball?

After reading this post, discussion is over.

[Ultra Chimp 1]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

I'd choose Sweed over Kelly. However, my feelings lie with James Hardy. When its all said and done, I think Hardy will statistically amount to a superior NFL player than any other WR in this years class.

[SquishDaFish]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

I was pro Kelley but after watching those videos I say Sweed is the better WR

[Jaybird]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

i think they all will be ok, but just ok

[Oaf]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

I was pro Kelley but after watching those videos I say Sweed is the better WR

Same, although some say Devin Thomas could be the next Boldin. But I don't think Thomas makes it to our 2nd either.

[yordad]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

I'd go with Sweed. Moneywise, he's going to be cheaper and as far as
his skills, he's got great speed and I like his unorthodox receiving skills,
especially when it comes to adjusting the ball when thrown awkwardly or
underthrown. BTW, Trent doesn't have a "rag arm" and he's gonna
have to learn to play in nasty cold weather.

Moneywise? How?

Having watched both for a couple of years I can tell you that Sweed is by far the better run blocker and much more physical,

This could be a tie breaker. I have to admit though, I haven't watched them here. And, it would be interesting to check out Hardy's run game too.

[PECKERWOOD]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

Sweed is more physical and has more speed. I think both Kelly and Sweed are worthy of the #11 pick though.. If we take either one I'm happy.

[yordad]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

I think WR is a bigger need than CB. Heck, TE is probably a bigger need. But, I can see how it might be better value wise to go CB.

How many second round CBs will be an opening day starter? IMO, there could be a handful available in the first. It might be better to grab a CB in the first, and hope there isn't a run on WR. Another argument is how expansive a good CB is. Seems they get record contracts. And, DRC wouldn't be much of a reach here, if at all.

There are a handful of WRs I think will start opening day and have the potential to really produce (especially in the red zone). And, at the same time be effective in the run game. Those guys are projected to be gone by our second pick at this point too. But, there are about 10 more who could be starting very soon, and become legit #2s.

It is crazy how all these guys shot up on mock drafts. Hardy, Thomas, Sweed, Kelly. But not all the way up. All would seem like a reach at 11.

Oh, and our TEs are so bad, and this draft is so deep, we could choose between 3 to 10 starter in the third.

Leaving us with one more glaring offensive need. FB. I like Owen Schmitt. Which would leave us longing for a better center... John Sullivan can push Fowler.

That CB, WR, TE, FB, C, combo could get us 5 first year starters out of one draft.

For me, the deciding fact is McKelvin, Jenkins, DRC, Talib, Cason and Flowers will all be gone by our second. While Doucet, Caldwell, Nelson, and maybe one of the higher prospects previously mentioned, will be available in the second.

Moss still has to be played twice a year.

DRC is the tallest CB in the draft. Had the highest CB vertical. The farthest long jump. One of the top 5 40 times.

AND

He scored as many TDs as a freshman CB as he gave up to the guy he covered all four years combined.

So,

It would be way better to trade back. Trade our third and first to the Cowboys for their two first rounders. Throw in a 7th to sweeten it if we have to. It works points wise. If only McFadden would fall to us, the cowboy would be all over that deal.

Then we get Sweed, Kelly, Hardy, or Thomas (in that order), and one of those CBs mention. Oh, and if DRC is available at 22, WR waits til 28.

So, come on McFadden. Your like one tiny domestic dispute away.

[Confused]

Re: Kelly vs. Sweed

Trade down and grab Hardy.