And as I mentioned in another thread, Hackett was in the top 10 of all WRs in catches when he's targeted. It wasn't the offense, it was him.Originally Posted by madness
And as I mentioned in another thread, Hackett was in the top 10 of all WRs in catches when he's targeted. It wasn't the offense, it was him.Originally Posted by madness
"It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
Obviously it was the injuries that scared teams off. That's why one team was smart enough to get him basically for free. Low risk, high reward.
http://www.seahawks.com/News/News.aspx?id=48226
Hackett had a career-year in 2006, recording 45 receptions for 610 yards and 4 touchdowns – playing primarily in the slot while Bobby Engram was dealing with a thyroid condition. Hackett, 25, was a fifth round draft choice out of Colorado in 2004.
he would have been nice to sign. But he is not an All-Star type of player.
Originally Posted by mysticsoto
Being the highest bidder does not make a team the wisest.Originally Posted by Philagape
Some people really need to chill.
That's 2006.Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
And in 2007 he played what, 6 games?
underperforming receivers?? branch and engram are both very good receivers.Originally Posted by madness
and engram is the slot receiver.. so stop with the "hackett didnt fit the bills because he was a slot guy" crap. he wasnt a slot guy.
the bills dropped the ball.. and we will pay for depending on a rookie.
"All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Time to start a daycare.
hackett got the same contract courtney anderson got..
way to fill a need.
lets take a "huge risk" on anderson who is almost assured to be no better than the 3rd string te if he even makes it through training camp.. but we can take a chance on hackett.
but you guys are fine with anderson.. cause he is a great bargain.
Regardless of what player or position you're discussing, whether he's a 'fit' or not, etc, I agree with NE39. It's a stupid philosophy.Originally Posted by NE39
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Better watch out Phil. Dr. Flector will yell at you for insinuating cuss words!Originally Posted by Philagape
Speaking of this, there have been posters on this site defending Buffalo against accusations of being called CHEAP a**es. That is exactly what we were on the offensive side of the ball this off season. We did a great job on defense and last year on the o-line but we have neglected a BIG void in the #2 veteran WR spot.
OBD turned cheap as hell all of a sudden especially when you look at what Hackett got in Carolina. You mean to tell me that OBD couldn't have singed Johnson for a bit more and bend a little bit? We couldn't sign Johnson for a 2 year $4 mill deal and as another poster mentioned draft your long term answer? Very bad move! This is pathetic considering how much we paid a luke warn Langston Walker last year.
For those of you that critisized me for cussing in asteriscs and calling our Bills cheap shame on you for not seeing through this negligence from OBD.
I love my Bills and think we are on the right track but for not getting some much needed veteran FA WR help fro Evans...not good. Pushes us back one more year from the playoffs.
Where else would you rather be than right here right now?
But relying on a rookie WR to help take you to the playoffs in 2008 is!Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
The amazing Calvin Johnson couldn't do it for Detroit last year but we can expect it from one of those other rookies this year.
You are right. Let's stick with Josh Reed and 5'9" 178 lb Roscoe Parrish. They'll get us over the hump.Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
i really dont see how hackett wuld be any more useful for us here. then we'd have, what? 3 slot recievers? ok he might be an upgrade but we dont need an upgrade at #3. we need an upgrade at #2. just because he had ok years in a good system doesnt mean he'd do jack here, nor does it mean anyone should make such a big deal over it. i think sometimes people get excited over semi-names from other teams without really realizing what the situation is
jesus.. for the 10th time.. hackett is not a ****ing slot receiver. he is 6' and played outside last year..
branch and he were outside.. engram was in the slot..
the very good numbers he put up last year were on the outside.
it doesnt matter now, but i am sick of seeing people post that over and over. it just is not true.
he played the slot the year before because engram was hurt and they had branch and jackson on the outside.
No reason whatsoever to be the slightest upset. We'll be fine with Reed or a rookie starting.Originally Posted by jpdex12
You should really watch football sometime and quit watching highlight clips on Youtube and looking at stats. There's a lot more that goes into being a good player than what kind of stats a person puts up.Originally Posted by Philagape
i watched every game that hackett played in this year.. he is a good receiver.
im still waiting on that dvd Gr8, the one that you said you have of every game hackett played this year.
your the one that is talking out of his ass.. if you watched the games, you never would have said he was a slot guy in the first place.
Still waiting for you to send me your information and the money for shipping.Originally Posted by Tatonka
BTW, I said he was a #3 WR at best. And I still find it highly unlikely that you watched any of his games, if you had you wouldn't be obsessed with the guy because he's nothing special.