I had a argument with someone on a different forum. I sayed that AD is more of a elusive back like LT. He then sayed that LT doesnt run over people.
Whats up with other people saying AD is a power back.
Collapse
X
-
Re: Whats up with other people saying AD is a power back.
Originally posted by andyxc71AP breaks tackles for a living. He's a one cut, break some arm tackles and excellerate kind of back.
Comment
-
-
Re: Whats up with other people saying AD is a power back.
I don't know if you could call him a power back, but he finishes his runs better than anyone in the NFL. If he has to run over someone, he will put down his shoulder and do it, he just doesn't have to do it because he can do a lot more than that.
Peterson is a great finisher, though.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Whats up with other people saying AD is a power back.
The only reason to ever take Peterson out of the lineup is when he needs a rest. He can run with power. He can run with speed. He can catch and he can make you miss. In that sense he's more versatile than Earl Campbell. If there is one downside to Peterson, it is that he may take more of a beating than he has to, and that could potentially shorten his career.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Comment
-
-
Re: Whats up with other people saying AD is a power back.
Originally posted by THATHURMANATORI don't even think he has this nickname. I think these guys just made it up.
Comment
-
Comment