Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline

  1. #1
    Registered User !Papacrunk!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline

    SI: DEADLINE


    Item three: Miami is negotiating with one player right now -- Michigan tackle Jake Long. There is a deadline, yes; I don't know what it is. But if Long doesn't agree to a deal -- think of something less than the six-year, $62-million deal ($31 million guaranteed) signed by JaMarcus Russell last year -- Parcells will move to his next guy. My educated guess -- which an NFL front-office acquaintance of Parcells seems sure of -- is that the next candidate will be Gholston, the Ohio State defensive end.
    If this were Parcells, acting alone, I think he'd try to break the first-round-rookie salary scale, because he doesn't care if some 22-year-old rich kid holds out and holds press conferences about how a team is ripping him off. But this is different. The Dolphins are so down and out right now, with a new owner, GM and coach -- and a community that can't stomach much more bad news regarding the team. So Parcells, I believe, will take a small victory if he can engineer it, the victory of paying this year's first pick less than the first pick earned last year.

  2. #2
    Registered User LtFinFan66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Valparaiso, Florida
    Posts
    47,199
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 49 Times in 24 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    252

    Re: Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline


  3. #3
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,820
    Thanks
    30,523
    Thanked 30,528 Times in 17,421 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline

    I read somewhere they were also negotiating with Gholston.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  4. #4
    Registered User Mike13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Miami FL
    Posts
    10,370
    Thanks
    3,702
    Thanked 3,074 Times in 2,009 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline

    Hmmmmmm its strange that Parcells would put this info out there.

  5. #5
    Registered User !Papacrunk!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Dolphins Negotiating W/ Jake Long 2: The Deadline

    I think it's about time someone tries to buck the system and not have to sell the farm for someone's potential.

    The worst team in the league gets to pick first, in hopes of improving, but even with the increased salary cap, rookie contracts are getting (even for the NFL) extremely unreasonable. Who knows if you're going to get a Peyton Manning or a Ryan Leaf. If you pick a Leaf, there goes a huge chunk of change down the drain. One could blame their own scouting department/GM for that mistake, but sometimes even the best of GMs can pick a lemon. Even if they pick a Manning, that's a huge amount of money tied into one person, obviously. I really think they need to develop the, somewhat recently, discussed rookie salary so that there can be true parity and have bad teams eventually become competitive w/o having extremely huge gobs of money tied into potential.

    I wonder where Jake Long goes from here--does he take a contract that will be huge since it's the number pick, but not as huge as last year's (QB) contract? Or does he take the risk of taking the #2 or later contract? Let's say he turns it down--a player such as Vernon Gholston takes the similar lower contract, wouldn't that set the pace for the rest of the picks? If it was to set the pace, wouldn't that confirm the low contract Jake Long would get since he would get picked after the 1st pick? If it would work that way, then I don't see how he wouldn't take the contract, and by doing so, Parcells and Co. would re-establish some sort of control for teams that are worried about rolling the dice on the #1 pick contract future.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •