Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 61

Thread: shockey traded to saints!

  1. #41
    Do you read what you write? Oaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    6,139
    Thanks
    1,223
    Thanked 900 Times in 548 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Royal may have reached the 35 on that 2nd play.

  2. #42
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Already a thread on this in the NFL Zone, where it belongs, to anyone who thinks that Shockey would be more of a positive than a negative here...I ask ONE question.

    WHY?

  3. #43
    81 st zoner mybills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    61,717
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 38 Times in 17 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    200

    Re: Shockey gone.

    I don't they can explain it, OAF.
    I didn't come here to fight, I hate fighting. Life is way too short to spend it on fighting! Go fight with yourself, one of you will eventually win!

  4. #44
    Jersey Girl!!!!!! njsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    6,021
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy
    We could of paid that...
    Not worth his bad demeanor!

  5. #45
    Jersey Girl!!!!!! njsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    6,021
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by ddaryl
    I would love an upgrade at TE, but Shokey wasn't the answer.

    There is just way too much info that pretty much demonstrates that Shokey was a cancer more so then a play maker

    Absolutely right on!

  6. #46
    The Octagon Devin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The Bayou
    Posts
    23,878
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    133

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Totally understand people, I mean really why on earth would the Bills need a Pro Bowl TE who averages 62 receptions, 705 yards and 4-5 TD's a year.

    We have Robert Royal.

    Look I dont argue that we have other pressing needs, and I am not heartbroken we didnt get Shockey. But anyone making excuses about why hes being traded, or that hes a detriment to the team....etc is kidding themselves.

    Shockey is a top end TE, and I wouldnt be shocked if he hits the pro bowl again year one with the Saints.

  7. #47
    Jersey Girl!!!!!! njsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    6,021
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by Devin
    Totally understand people, I mean really why on earth would the Bills need a Pro Bowl TE who averages 62 receptions, 705 yards and 4-5 TD's a year.

    We have Robert Royal.

    Look I dont argue that we have other pressing needs, and I am not heartbroken we didnt get Shockey. But anyone making excuses about why hes being traded, or that hes a detriment to the team....etc is kidding themselves.

    Shockey is a top end TE, and I wouldnt be shocked if he hits the pro bowl again year one with the Saints.
    Are you at all aware of all the *****ing and trouble this guy has caused for the NYgiants? His play does not equal his character.

    Good riddens Shockey!

  8. #48
    Zero for Zero! Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    67,918
    Thanks
    14,087
    Thanked 17,689 Times in 8,476 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    286

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by Devin
    Totally understand people, I mean really why on earth would the Bills need a Pro Bowl TE who averages 62 receptions, 705 yards and 4-5 TD's a year.

    We have Robert Royal.

    Look I dont argue that we have other pressing needs, and I am not heartbroken we didnt get Shockey. But anyone making excuses about why hes being traded, or that hes a detriment to the team....etc is kidding themselves.

    Shockey is a top end TE, and I wouldnt be shocked if he hits the pro bowl again year one with the Saints.
    I understand your point and only a fool would not agree that Shockey is a much better TE than Royal.

    But, look at the Giants play with him and without him. The best players are not always the best teammates or the most conducive to winning or being successful.

    He is a me first guy who does not get along with teammates or coaches. He is a player who, in 6 years has never played a full NFL season and whose physical style leads to a short career.
    Quote Originally Posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.

  9. #49
    Jersey Girl!!!!!! njsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    6,021
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Believe me the Buffalo Bills don't need this guy. His play does not equal his character. Let his former O coordinator Sean Payton deal with him.

  10. #50
    Let the planet get warmer. We'll grow oranges in Alaska! tat2dmike77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Head in the sand
    Posts
    9,285
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    80

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Anthor overrated ego from Miami U no thanks?

    My my my how quickly everyone has forgotten McGayhee.


  11. #51
    Registered User DrGraves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,693
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Quote Originally Posted by FunTimesYaY!
    Already a thread on this in the NFL Zone, where it belongs, to anyone who thinks that Shockey would be more of a positive than a negative here...I ask ONE question.

    WHY?
    why? go to our roster and look at tight end... there lies your answer.

  12. #52
    Do you read what you write? Oaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    6,139
    Thanks
    1,223
    Thanked 900 Times in 548 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Shockey gone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oaf
    Royal may have reached the 35 on that 2nd play.
    Right.
    This thread was not so much to announce the Shockey trade as it was to voice my displeasure of being reminded of our own TE situation. And that made me recall the FB situation because both positions were awful at the end of the year and they were both similarly addressed (sorry Fine, no hate man). And then I remembered Melvin Fowler while I was at it.

    Even CB admits it. "That's why I never thought the Bills would be serious players for Shockey's services. Yes, they needed an upgrade at tight end in terms of an athletic receiving threat, but they weren't going to do it at the expense of the chemistry in their locker room, not to mention the prospect of injury, which with Shockey is very, very real."

    OBD deserves praise for really bolstering our DLine, completing a new-look LB core, pulling the "best" corner in the draft in addition to James, waiting patiently to pick from 3 of the top WRs, and that's about it. If we are to fulfill the expectations of 80% of the national media, OBD should stop telling themselves we can improve at FB, TE, and C next year. Really, that's all I have a problem with before I could predict an 11-5 season.

    Are we really banking on a 2nd round pick and sophmore improvements to pull our offense from 30th to playoff caliber?

  13. #53
    The Octagon Devin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The Bayou
    Posts
    23,878
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    133

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by njsue

    Good riddens
    Is that like riddance or is it worse?

  14. #54
    Registered User Ickybaluky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    8,884
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    46

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by Devin
    Is that like riddance or is it worse?
    She is predicting his death.

  15. #55
    Retired - On Several Levels Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    33,117
    Thanks
    9,387
    Thanked 14,240 Times in 7,618 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    126

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by NE39
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

  16. #56
    Administrator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    107,370
    Thanks
    4,843
    Thanked 24,441 Times in 14,158 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    276

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    I understand your point and only a fool would not agree that Shockey is a much better TE than Royal.

    But, look at the Giants play with him and without him. The best players are not always the best teammates or the most conducive to winning or being successful.

    He is a me first guy who does not get along with teammates or coaches. He is a player who, in 6 years has never played a full NFL season and whose physical style leads to a short career.
    Wouldn't it also be slightly foolish to assume that Shockey simply being hurt is the only logical reason why the Giants played so well and won the Super Bowl? Wouldn't it also be the growth of Eli Manning, the gelling of the offensive line, the emergence of Justin Tuck, Steve Smith playing above rookie expectations...but it couldn't be any of that. It was simply all about Jeremy Shockey getting hurt...Im not saying his injury had nothing to do with it and there is no doubt he was a bad fit in NY, but you dont just pass on a 700+ yard TE because he talks. Pay the man give him the ball and he won't talk, its very similar to TO, who Id also take on this team in an instant.
    COMING SOON...
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

  17. #57
    Zero for Zero! Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    67,918
    Thanks
    14,087
    Thanked 17,689 Times in 8,476 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    286

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy
    Wouldn't it also be slightly foolish to assume that Shockey simply being hurt is the only logical reason why the Giants played so well and won the Super Bowl? Wouldn't it also be the growth of Eli Manning, the gelling of the offensive line, the emergence of Justin Tuck, Steve Smith playing above rookie expectations...but it couldn't be any of that. It was simply all about Jeremy Shockey getting hurt...Im not saying his injury had nothing to do with it and there is no doubt he was a bad fit in NY, but you dont just pass on a 700+ yard TE because he talks. Pay the man give him the ball and he won't talk, its very similar to TO, who Id also take on this team in an instant.
    I never said is the only reason, just that the timing seems to indicate that it was a reason.

    The problem you cited is this "him the ball" attitude. Getting the ball is more important to him than the teams success. Players like TO and Shockey sulk when they don't get their way and are not team players.

    I would never want TO. First, he is overrated (leads the league in drops every year). 2nd he has shown that he will throw his teammates, especially the QB, under the bus when it suits him. He is also interested in being the center of attention, even to the detriment of his team.

    It goes much past the talking. It goes into the team chemistry and players ability to work well together. Shockey (and TO) damage that relationship.

    The best TEAM does not always have the best players.

  18. #58
    All-Pro Zoner RingofFire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    How on earth can you be an Oakland A's fan. I hate Billy Beane baseball. Trade players for prospects the moment they get good because you don't want to pay anyone. and the moment the prospects get good... you trade them too!!! it get so depressing. He doesn't care about ever winning. Just wants to get to playoffs 1 yr outta evert 6-7 and get swept. So he can get credit cause he got to playoffs with kids. It doesn't work. He is just cheap. It's not just about small payroll. He doesn't pay anybodyyyyyyyyyyyy.

  19. #59
    Zero for Zero! Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    67,918
    Thanks
    14,087
    Thanked 17,689 Times in 8,476 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    286

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    Calm down Stamps.

    Willie Randolph is looking for you.

  20. #60
    Registered User Bert102176's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wellsville, New York, United States
    Posts
    3,742
    Thanks
    843
    Thanked 106 Times in 75 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: shockey traded to saints!

    we screwed up not going after him
    lets go BUFFALO lets go BUFFALO

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •