Anthony Spencer
Martellus Bennett
and a 4th or 5th Rd pick
for Peters....
Right now, take it or leave it?
Anthony Spencer
Martellus Bennett
and a 4th or 5th Rd pick
for Peters....
Right now, take it or leave it?
LEAVE IT.
STFU with these stupid threads, trading Peters is a moronic idea.
leave it... not enough in the proven department
Leave it!
You pay Peters than anyone/everyone whom thinks they don't have a fair contract will be crying poverty going forward....
If Bruce's contracts were never addressed, then Peters should not be.....Period......You address Peters, then Edwards is next, because he makes less than most starters in the league far worse than him....(Russell etc).....
You can't pay him....Just can't
are we talking Bruce Smith ???? his contract was always addressed every other frickin year.Originally Posted by JPFBillsFan
Pro bowl LT's get paid big time... but is he worth a top 5 LT contract, do Chambers and Bell fill in well, and does Peters mouth ever shut up are the questions.
If Edwards puts up probowl numbers you can bet he'll get his just payday.. .Plus Edwards is not a pay me noise maker IMO... when his turn comes he'll get rewarded.. but he hasn't put up the numbers yet, he is just showing he can continue to develope into a big time QB
Look if you can improve your team in a number of area's using Peters in a trade, then I think you have to do it....
Can't just keep relying on draft picks....Free Agents don't want to come to Buffalo....at least good ones.....
These trade peters threads are getting old fast.
Do what, get your qb killed? And then what, blame the qb for the teams offensive problems again?
You guys are hilarious. This is the AFCE. Stop trading our PROVEN players away.
but you want to trade him for 2 players who have barely proven much and still have question marks about the type of pros they will be... Peters is worth more then these 2 guys.
and FA do come to Buffalo, just not every single one of them
A 3-4 LB who thus far has done nothing to warrant his first rounder status. Yes he played DE in college but thats to much of a what if for me.
A TE with potential but backing up the best TE in football not named Gonzales.
And a few scrub picks.
For a pro-bowl LT.
Pass.
but Peters is fast becoming a douche bag, verbal cancer.... I want him to stay, but I have a real hard time with players like him... I despise them.
What does Peters want ? Will his agent try to make him the highest paid LT in the league? How much proven talent could we get fom him ? The Bills haven't looked much different when he is not playing either...
I am definitely interested in seeing Chamber play agianst NE since this is a must win for NE..
He won't get killed.....not like he's standing up that much right now anyways
Fine not the trade I suggested but something like that....not just a 1st rd pick because you can't just keep adding untested youth....
we need a solid couple of players in return....
Who dat?
I understand Peters side.The bills extended his contract as a RT. He got moved to LT and made probowl twice. He isn't even paid as an average LT. Pay him the money or someone else will . I'm tired of being mediocre and the last thing we need to do is trade our above average players and trade them for unproven ones.
When Peters held out, I said for him to go screw himself. He should come in and play this season and if he makes probowl again, pay the man. He's made it and should get paid instead of guys like Schobel and Kelsay.
Walker and Dockery are paid way more than Peters.
thats a fool comment
Trent has been sacked 21 times in 13 games
in 2006 JP was sacked 47 times in 16 games. Before our OL upgrades of Dockery and Walker and moving Peters to LT
Trent's on his feet quite a bit, and heluva alot better then QB in Buffalo have been over the last 10 years
Trent is also getting sacked less because he looks to unload the ball fast too.
Problem with ProBowl is that its a popularity contest....Plus it behooves other players to vote Peters in, it improves there stance in wage increases....
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
